LAU KOON YING MATTHEW v. LAU TARK WING AND OTHERS
The court held the Master erred in exercising discretion to award compound interest because there was insufficient evidential foundation to infer that the defendants used the funds in trade or made profits or had put themselves in a position giving rise to a presumption of compound returns; therefore compound interest was replaced with simple interest. Extension of time to appeal was granted (limited to the ground on interest) because delay was excusable due to genuine procedural mistake by appellants' counsel; remaining parts of the Master's Orders (including disallowance of deductions and refusal to credit construction costs) were upheld.
- Citation
- [2020] HKCFI 2107
- Parties
- Plaintiff and Executor of the Estate of LAU YIU WING: LAU KOON YING MATTHEW; 1st Defendant (personal): LAU TARK WING; Executor of the Estate of TANG MEI HO (2nd Defendant in Probate Action): LAU TARK WING; Defendant (company): WING HING RESOURCES LIMITED; Defendant (company): CABA RESOURCES LIMITED
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 21 August 2020
- Case Number
- HCA2306/2012
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Master's Orders Following Taking of Accounts in Probate and Related Actions / Hearing and Judgment on Extension of Time and Merits in the Court of First Instance (appeal Against Master's Orders)
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part. Extension of time to appeal granted limited to the issue of interest. Compound interest ordered by the Master replaced by simple interest; remainder of the Master's Orders upheld.
- Legal Topics
- Compound Interest, Taking of Accounts, Extension of Time to Appeal, Surcharge and Falsification, Fiduciary Duty, Interest Commencement, Construction Costs
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
LAU KOON YING MATTHEW
Plaintiff and Executor of the Estate of LAU YIU WING
LAU TARK WING
1st Defendant (personal)
LAU TARK WING
Executor of the Estate of TANG MEI HO (2nd Defendant in Probate Action)
WING HING RESOURCES LIMITED
Defendant (company)
CABA RESOURCES LIMITED
Defendant (company)
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Master's Orders Following Taking of Accounts in Probate and Related Actions / Hearing and Judgment on Extension of Time and Merits in the Court of First Instance (appeal Against Master's Orders)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether compound (compounded yearly) interest could be awarded instead of simple interest on misapplied trust/fiduciary funds
- 2 Whether interest should run from accrual dates (1992/1997) or from commencement of proceedings given delay
- 3 Whether construction costs should be credited against sums claimed
Ratio Decidendi
The court held the Master erred in exercising discretion to award compound interest because there was insufficient evidential foundation to infer that the defendants used the funds in trade or made profits or had put themselves in a position giving rise to a presumption of compound returns; therefore compound interest was replaced with simple interest. Extension of time to appeal was granted (limited to the ground on interest) because delay was excusable due to genuine procedural mistake by appellants' counsel; remaining parts of the Master's Orders (including disallowance of deductions and refusal to credit construction costs) were upheld.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part. Extension of time to appeal granted limited to the issue of interest. Compound interest ordered by the Master replaced by simple interest; remainder of the Master's Orders upheld.
Orders
- Extension of time to file the Notices of Appeal granted (limited to Ground 1)
- Compound (compounded yearly) interest in the Master's Orders replaced by simple interest
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment