LAU KOON YING MATTHEW, as the Executor of the estate of LAU YIU WING, deceased (“the Deceased”) v. LAU TARK WING AND ANOTHER
The master erred in law and in the exercise of discretion by awarding compound interest: there was insufficient evidence that the defendants used the sums in a commercial or trading manner or otherwise put themselves in a position to attract a presumption of compounded profit, and the master misunderstood and misapplied the legal principle permitting compound interest in lieu of an account of profits. The appropriate remedy is simple interest; extension of time to appeal is granted limited to the ground attacking compound interest; other parts of the master's orders stand.
- Citation
- [2020] HKCFI 2107
- Parties
- Plaintiff; Executor of the Estate of LAU YIU Wing, Deceased: LAU KOON YING MATTHEW; 1st Defendant; Sued in Personal Capacity and as Executor of Estate of TANG MEI HO: LAU TARK WING; Defendant; Company Controlled by LAU TARK WING (party to 2305 and 2306 Actions): WING HING RESOURCES LIMITED; Defendant; Company Controlled by LAU TARK WING (party to 2306 Action): CABA RESOURCES LIMITED
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 21 August 2020
- Case Number
- HCAP23/2013
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Master's Decision on Taking of Accounts and Related Probate and Civil Actions / Judgment on Appeal and Application for Extension of Time (decision Dated 21 August 2020)
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part. Extension of time to appeal granted limited to challenge to compound interest (Ground 1). Compound interest awarded by the Master set aside and replaced by simple interest. All other parts of the Master's Orders upheld.
- Legal Topics
- Compound Interest, Taking of Accounts, Surcharge and Falsification of Accounts, Extension of Time to Appeal, Fiduciary Duty, Pre Judgment Interest Period, Deduction for Construction Costs
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
LAU KOON YING MATTHEW
Plaintiff; Executor of the Estate of LAU YIU Wing, Deceased
LAU TARK WING
1st Defendant; Sued in Personal Capacity and as Executor of Estate of TANG MEI HO
WING HING RESOURCES LIMITED
Defendant; Company Controlled by LAU TARK WING (party to 2305 and 2306 Actions)
CABA RESOURCES LIMITED
Defendant; Company Controlled by LAU TARK WING (party to 2306 Action)
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Master's Decision on Taking of Accounts and Related Probate and Civil Actions / Judgment on Appeal and Application for Extension of Time (decision Dated 21 August 2020)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether compound (compound) interest was properly awarded in lieu of an account of profits
- 2 Whether interest should run from the dates of accrual (1992/1997) or from commencement of proceedings because of plaintiff delay
- 3 Whether construction costs should be credited/deducted from amounts due
Ratio Decidendi
The master erred in law and in the exercise of discretion by awarding compound interest: there was insufficient evidence that the defendants used the sums in a commercial or trading manner or otherwise put themselves in a position to attract a presumption of compounded profit, and the master misunderstood and misapplied the legal principle permitting compound interest in lieu of an account of profits. The appropriate remedy is simple interest; extension of time to appeal is granted limited to the ground attacking compound interest; other parts of the master's orders stand.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part. Extension of time to appeal granted limited to challenge to compound interest (Ground 1). Compound interest awarded by the Master set aside and replaced by simple interest. All other parts of the Master's Orders upheld.
Orders
- Extension of time to appeal granted in respect of Ground 1 only
- Compound interest in the Master's Orders to be replaced by simple interest
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment