RE Tin Tin Yat Pao (International) Ltd.

RE Tin Tin Yat Pao (International) Ltd.

The court exercised its discretion to grant a short adjournment (to a date not before 7 days after 15 July 2001) because the potential prejudice to the contributories from refusing the adjournment — namely the possible permanent loss of the company's claims against the former controllers (the Hos) and their management company — outweighed the limited and manageable risk that the opportunity to compromise or to enter judgment would be lost; costs of the adjournment were ordered against the creditor who failed to notify the liquidators of the imminent investor agreement.

Citation
RE Tin Tin Yat Pao (International) Ltd.
Parties
Company/plaintiff (in Liquidation): Tin Tin Yat Pao (International) Limited; Liquidators/applicants: Joint and Several Liquidators; Creditor/opponent: Cheng Yun Sing; Shareholder (90% Owner): Tin Tin Yat Pao Ltd.; Defendant/licensee: Tin Tin Publication Development Ltd; Defendant/parent Company: Televerse Publishing Ltd; Former Controller/defendant: Ho Sai Chu; Former Controller/defendant: Salina Ko; Defendant/recipient of Management Fees: company controlled by Mrs Ho
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
31 May 2001
Case Number
HCCW579/1995
Procedural Posture
Companies (winding‑up) Proceedings Under Companies Ordinance Cap.32 / Application Under S.199(1)(f) and Alternative Summons Under S.200(3) for Leave to Compromise Proceedings and to Enter Judgment; Interim Hearing and Adjournment Application
Outcome
Hearing adjourned to an early date to be fixed not before 7 days after 15 July 2001; costs of the adjournment ordered to be paid by Cheng Yun Sing
Legal Topics
Compromise of Litigation by Liquidators, Winding‑up Petition, Adjournment, Application to Enter Judgment, Fund in Court/tenders, Injunctions and Passing‑off, Costs Allocation
Source Language
EN
Company Law Insolvency Civil Procedure Intellectual Property Compromise of Litigation by Liquidators Winding‑up Petition Adjournment Application to Enter Judgment +3 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 8
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Tin Tin Yat Pao (International) Limited

Company/plaintiff (in Liquidation)

Joint and Several Liquidators

Liquidators/applicants

Cheng Yun Sing

Creditor/opponent

Tin Tin Yat Pao Ltd.

Shareholder (90% Owner)

Tin Tin Publication Development Ltd

Defendant/licensee

Televerse Publishing Ltd

Defendant/parent Company

Ho Sai Chu

Former Controller/defendant

Salina Ko

Former Controller/defendant

company controlled by Mrs Ho

Defendant/recipient of Management Fees

Procedural Posture

Companies (winding‑up) Proceedings Under Companies Ordinance Cap.32 / Application Under S.199(1)(f) and Alternative Summons Under S.200(3) for Leave to Compromise Proceedings and to Enter Judgment; Interim Hearing and Adjournment Application

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the liquidators should be granted leave under s.199(1)(f) to compromise three sets of proceedings
  2. 2 Whether leave should be given under s.200(3) to enter judgment on the Alternative Claim and to apply for payment out of the fund in court
  3. 3 Whether the hearing should be adjourned to allow a shareholder to secure investor funds and potentially regain control

Ratio Decidendi

The court exercised its discretion to grant a short adjournment (to a date not before 7 days after 15 July 2001) because the potential prejudice to the contributories from refusing the adjournment — namely the possible permanent loss of the company's claims against the former controllers (the Hos) and their management company — outweighed the limited and manageable risk that the opportunity to compromise or to enter judgment would be lost; costs of the adjournment were ordered against the creditor who failed to notify the liquidators of the imminent investor agreement.

Court Disposition

Hearing adjourned to an early date to be fixed not before 7 days after 15 July 2001; costs of the adjournment ordered to be paid by Cheng Yun Sing

Orders

  • Hearing adjourned to an early date to be fixed not before 7 days after 15 July 2001
  • Costs of the adjournment to be paid by Cheng Yun Sing