EVERSOUND INVESTMENTS LTD v. LEUNG KWOK NUN AND OTHERS
The Tribunal accepted the applicant's expert EUV and RDV valuations (adopting scenario 1 domestic use for ground floor), found the building to be over 53 years old with severe structural and non-structural defects making redevelopment justified and repairs economically unjustifiable, found the applicant had taken...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- EVERSOUND INVESTMENTS LTD v. LEUNG KWOK NUN AND OTHERS
- Parties
- Applicant (majority Owner): Eversound Investments Limited; 1st Respondent (discontinued): Leung Kwok Nun (personal representative of estate of Leung Wing Lai); 2nd Respondent (discontinued): Lor Chan Sum; 3rd Respondent (minority Owner; Personal Representative): Personal Representative of the estate of Cheng Tin (also known as Cheng Tim); 4th Respondent (minority Owner; Personal Representative): Personal Representative of the estate of Cheung Chiu; 5th Respondent (registered Owner of 7/f No.18 Wan Shun Street; Minority Owner): Tse Chi Kwong (alias Tse Kwong); 6th Respondent (registered Owner of Flat B 7/f No.17 Wan King Street; Withdrew Opposition): Wang Yan Rachel (黃恩); 7th Respondents (registered Owner of Roof; Minority Owners): Chung Ming Fai and Chung Ching Man
- Court
- Lands Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 29 August 2013
- Case Number
- LDCS32000/2012
- Procedural Posture
- Compulsory Sale for Redevelopment Under Land (compulsory Sale for Redevelopment) Ordinance, Cap.545 / Final Judgment (order for Sale)
- Outcome
- Order for compulsory sale granted
- Legal Topics
- Compulsory Sale, Redevelopment Justification, Existing Use Value (euv) Valuation, Reasonable Steps to Acquire Minority Shares, Reserve Price Fixation, Trustee Appointment, Dispensing With Service
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Eversound Investments Limited
Applicant (majority Owner)
Leung Kwok Nun (personal representative of estate of Leung Wing Lai)
1st Respondent (discontinued)
Lor Chan Sum
2nd Respondent (discontinued)
Personal Representative of the estate of Cheng Tin (also known as Cheng Tim)
3rd Respondent (minority Owner; Personal Representative)
Personal Representative of the estate of Cheung Chiu
4th Respondent (minority Owner; Personal Representative)
Tse Chi Kwong (alias Tse Kwong)
5th Respondent (registered Owner of 7/f No.18 Wan Shun Street; Minority Owner)
Wang Yan Rachel (黃恩)
6th Respondent (registered Owner of Flat B 7/f No.17 Wan King Street; Withdrew Opposition)
Chung Ming Fai and Chung Ching Man
7th Respondents (registered Owner of Roof; Minority Owners)
Procedural Posture
Compulsory Sale for Redevelopment Under Land (compulsory Sale for Redevelopment) Ordinance, Cap.545 / Final Judgment (order for Sale)
Legal Issues
- 1 Determination of existing use values (EUV) of units
- 2 Whether redevelopment is justified by age and state of repair
- 3 Whether applicant took reasonable steps to acquire remaining undivided shares
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal accepted the applicant's expert EUV and RDV valuations (adopting scenario 1 domestic use for ground floor), found the building to be over 53 years old with severe structural and non-structural defects making redevelopment justified and repairs economically unjustifiable, found the applicant had taken reasonable steps to acquire remaining shares by making multiple offers above expert valuation, and therefore granted an order for compulsory sale with reserve price fixed at HK$78.10 million and appointed trustees to conduct the sale.
Court Disposition
Order for compulsory sale granted
Orders
- All undivided shares in Remaining Portion of Kowloon Marine Lot No.52 to be sold by public auction for redevelopment
- Reserve price for the auction fixed at HK$78,100,000
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment