ORIENTAL GENERATION LTD AND OTHERS v. LUK YUNG AND OTHERS
The Tribunal held applicants satisfied statutory ownership threshold and had taken reasonable steps; accepted Savills' direct-comparison EUV including specific CPS adjustments and accepted agreed RDV of HK$2,293,000,000 reached by valuation experts; rejected inclusion of speculative hope value because the legal chance of removing the lease height restriction at nil premium was not shown to be a reasonable (>50%) prospect; ordered compulsory sale by public auction with reserve price HK$2,293,000,000, appointed trustees and solicitors and made costs order nisi.
- Citation
- ORIENTAL GENERATION LTD AND OTHERS v. LUK YUNG AND OTHERS
- Parties
- 1st Applicant: Oriental Generation Limited; 2nd Applicant: China Creation Investment Limited; 3rd Applicant: Smart Beauty Limited; 4th Applicant: Wong Wing Wah; Respondent (major CPS Owner): R22 (owner of 82 CPS); Respondent (cps Purchaser): R33; Respondent (cps Purchaser): R34; Respondent (cps Purchaser): R40; Respondent (cps Purchaser): R44; Respondent (unit Owner): R2 (Madam Ip Wai Har); Respondent (unit Owner): R8; Respondent (unit Owner): R9; Respondent (shop Owner): R13; Respondent (unit Owner): R17
- Court
- Lands Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 29 February 2016
- Case Number
- LDCS4000/2013
- Procedural Posture
- Land (compulsory Sale for Redevelopment) Application / Judgment at Trial (lands Tribunal)
- Outcome
- Application granted: compulsory sale ordered by public auction for redevelopment; trustees and trustees' solicitors appointed; reserve price set; sale conditions approved; costs order nisi made
- Legal Topics
- Compulsory Sale, Redevelopment Justification, Existing Use Value (euv), Redevelopment Value (rdv) / Residual Valuation, Hope Value, Lease Modification and Premium, Expert Evidence and Credibility, Appointment of Trustees, Auction Reserve Price
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Oriental Generation Limited
1st Applicant
China Creation Investment Limited
2nd Applicant
Smart Beauty Limited
3rd Applicant
Wong Wing Wah
4th Applicant
R22 (owner of 82 CPS)
Respondent (major CPS Owner)
R33
Respondent (cps Purchaser)
R34
Respondent (cps Purchaser)
R40
Respondent (cps Purchaser)
R44
Respondent (cps Purchaser)
R2 (Madam Ip Wai Har)
Respondent (unit Owner)
R8
Respondent (unit Owner)
R9
Respondent (unit Owner)
R13
Respondent (shop Owner)
R17
Respondent (unit Owner)
Procedural Posture
Land (compulsory Sale for Redevelopment) Application / Judgment at Trial (lands Tribunal)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether applicants met statutory ownership threshold (section 3 and s3(5) Notice)
- 2 Proper assessment of EUV for domestic units, shops and car parking spaces (CPS)
- 3 Whether redevelopment is justified by age/state of repair (section 4(2)(a))
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal held applicants satisfied statutory ownership threshold and had taken reasonable steps; accepted Savills' direct-comparison EUV including specific CPS adjustments and accepted agreed RDV of HK$2,293,000,000 reached by valuation experts; rejected inclusion of speculative hope value because the legal chance of removing the lease height restriction at nil premium was not shown to be a reasonable (>50%) prospect; ordered compulsory sale by public auction with reserve price HK$2,293,000,000, appointed trustees and solicitors and made costs order nisi.
Court Disposition
Application granted: compulsory sale ordered by public auction for redevelopment; trustees and trustees' solicitors appointed; reserve price set; sale conditions approved; costs order nisi made
Orders
- All undivided shares in the Lots to be sold by public auction for redevelopment under section 4(1)(b) of Cap 545
- Reserve price for the Lots set at HK$2,293,000,000
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment