ORIENTAL MOON LTD v. GOLDEN SINO LINK LTD AND OTHERS
Leave to appeal was refused because the intended grounds lacked any reasonable prospect of success and no other interest of justice justified an appeal; the stay of execution was refused because the minimum requirements for a stay were not met, the balance of prejudice favoured refusing a stay given the imminent...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] HKLdT 3
- Parties
- Applicant (majority Owner): Applicant; 1st Respondent (minority Owner): 1st Respondent; 4th Respondent (minority Owner): 4th Respondent; 3rd Respondent (owner / Owners' Corporation Chairman): 3rd Respondent
- Court
- Lands Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 9 January 2023
- Case Number
- LDCS32000/2019
- Procedural Posture
- Compulsory Sale for Redevelopment Under the Land (compulsory Sale for Redevelopment) Ordinance, Cap 545 / Interlocutory Application for Leave to Appeal Against Tribunal Judgment and Application for Stay of Execution (order for Sale)
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal dismissed; application for stay of execution refused; costs awarded to Applicant.
- Legal Topics
- Compulsory Sale, Redevelopment, Leave to Appeal, Stay of Execution, Age and State of Repair, Reasonable Steps to Acquire Undivided Shares, Expert Evidence Weight, Tenantable Standard
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Applicant
Applicant (majority Owner)
1st Respondent
1st Respondent (minority Owner)
4th Respondent
4th Respondent (minority Owner)
3rd Respondent
3rd Respondent (owner / Owners' Corporation Chairman)
Procedural Posture
Compulsory Sale for Redevelopment Under the Land (compulsory Sale for Redevelopment) Ordinance, Cap 545 / Interlocutory Application for Leave to Appeal Against Tribunal Judgment and Application for Stay of Execution (order for Sale)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leave to appeal should be granted under section 11AA(6) of the Lands Tribunal Ordinance
- 2 Whether a stay of execution should be granted pending appeal
- 3 Whether the age or state of repair of the building justifies an order for sale under section 4(2)(a) of the Ordinance
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to appeal was refused because the intended grounds lacked any reasonable prospect of success and no other interest of justice justified an appeal; the stay of execution was refused because the minimum requirements for a stay were not met, the balance of prejudice favoured refusing a stay given the imminent auction and risks to other parties and redevelopment value.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal dismissed; application for stay of execution refused; costs awarded to Applicant.
Orders
- Leave to appeal dismissed
- Application for stay of execution refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment