COURAGE INVESTMENTS LTD AND ANOTHER v. GO SIN LI alias WU SHEN LI AND OTHERS
The Tribunal found applicants met the statutory ownership threshold (80% under the Gazette notice), expert evidence (structural and condition surveys) demonstrated the Building's age and poor state of repair making redevelopment justified, applicants had taken reasonable steps to purchase minority shares, and the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] HKLdT 78
- Parties
- 1st Applicant: Courage Investments Limited; 2nd Applicant: Century Island Holdings Limited; 1st Respondent: 1st Respondent (name not recorded); 3rd Respondent: 3rd Respondent (name not recorded); 4th Respondent: I Hing (4th Respondent)
- Court
- Lands Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 21 December 2021
- Case Number
- LDCS17000/2020
- Procedural Posture
- Compulsory Sale for Redevelopment Under Land (compulsory Sale for Redevelopment) Ordinance Cap 545 / Judgment (lands Tribunal)
- Outcome
- Application allowed; order for sale granted by public auction for redevelopment under s4(1)(b) of the Ordinance.
- Legal Topics
- Compulsory Sale Order, Redevelopment Justification, Valuation (euv and Rdv), Reserve Price Determination, Reasonable Negotiation Steps to Acquire Minority Shares, State of Repair, Appointment of Sale Trustees, Adverse Possession Claim
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Courage Investments Limited
1st Applicant
Century Island Holdings Limited
2nd Applicant
1st Respondent (name not recorded)
1st Respondent
3rd Respondent (name not recorded)
3rd Respondent
I Hing (4th Respondent)
4th Respondent
Procedural Posture
Compulsory Sale for Redevelopment Under Land (compulsory Sale for Redevelopment) Ordinance Cap 545 / Judgment (lands Tribunal)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether applicants met statutory ownership threshold to apply (s3)
- 2 Whether redevelopment is justified by age or state of repair (s4(2)(a))
- 3 Whether applicants took reasonable steps to acquire minority interests (s4(2)(b))
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found applicants met the statutory ownership threshold (80% under the Gazette notice), expert evidence (structural and condition surveys) demonstrated the Building's age and poor state of repair making redevelopment justified, applicants had taken reasonable steps to purchase minority shares, and the Savills EUV and RDV assessments were accepted leading to a reserve price of HKD 368,000,000; accordingly the Tribunal granted a compulsory sale order by public auction, appointed trustees and fixed sale conditions including a 6 year redevelopment completion requirement.
Court Disposition
Application allowed; order for sale granted by public auction for redevelopment under s4(1)(b) of the Ordinance.
Orders
- Redevelopment of the Lots justified and applicants have taken reasonable steps to acquire undivided shares
- All undivided shares in the Lots to be sold together by public auction for redevelopment under s4(1)(b)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment