WHARF PROPERTIES LTD AND ANOTHER v. ERIC CUMINE ASSOCIATES, A RCHITECTS, ENGINEERS & SURVEYORS (a firm) AND OTHERS
The Side Agreements' Certificate of Final Sub-Contract Completion, by its clear and comprehensive wording, was conclusive that the sub-contractor had duly performed all obligations in respect of the Sub-Contract Works and therefore barred the plaintiffs' contractual claims; because the alleged tort duty arose from and was co-extensive with the contractual duties, the certificate equally barred the tort claims; the court may decide such pure points of contractual construction on a strike-out application when all material facts are undisputed.
- Citation
- WHARF PROPERTIES LTD AND ANOTHER v. ERIC CUMINE ASSOCIATES, A RCHITECTS, ENGINEERS & SURVEYORS (a firm) AND OTHERS
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: WAHRF PROPERTIES LIMITED; 2nd Plaintiff: THE HONG KONG AND KOWLOON WHARF; 3rd Plaintiff: GODOWN COMPANY LIMITED; 1st Defendant: ERIC CUMINE ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTS, ENGINEERS & SURVEYORS (a firm); 2nd Defendant: J. ROGER PRESTON & PARTNERS (a firm); 3rd Defendant: SHING YIP ENGINEERING COMPANY (a firm); 4th Defendant: JOHN LOK & PARTNERS LIMITED; 5th Defendant: INTRUSION-PREPART (FAR EAST) LIMITED; 6th Defendant: THE GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY OF HONG KONG LIMITED; 7th Defendant: V.S.L. ENGINEERS (HONG KONG) LIMITED; 8th Defendant: THE JARDINE ENGINEERING CORPORATION LIMITED; 9th Defendant: AMERICAN ENGINEERING CORPORATION (H.K.) LIMITED; 10th Defendant: GILMAN AND COMPANY LIMITED; 11th Defendant: ARNHOLD & COMPANY LIMITED; 12th Defendant: EMPIRE ENGINEERING COMPANY LIMITED; 13th Defendant: RELIANCE ENGINEERING AND TRADING COMPANY LIMITED; 14th Defendant: PLASTEEL HONG KONG LIMITED; 15th Defendant: SHUN HING ELECTRICAL WORKS AND ENGINEERING COMPANY LIMITED; 16th Defendant: MANSION COMPANY (a firm); 17th Defendant: FORTRESS LIMITED; 18th Defendant: JOHNSON CONTROLS (HONG KONG) LIMITED
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 17 October 1984
- Case Number
- HCA13431/1983
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Contract and Tort (construction Subcontract) / Interlocutory Application to Strike Out Parts of Statement of Claim
- Outcome
- Application allowed. Statement of Claim struck out as against the 8th defendant; action dismissed as against the 8th defendant with costs.
- Legal Topics
- Conclusive Certificates, Final Certificate of Completion, Contract Construction, Limitation of Tortious Duty, Striking Out Application, Release of Retention Monies
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
WAHRF PROPERTIES LIMITED
1st Plaintiff
THE HONG KONG AND KOWLOON WHARF
2nd Plaintiff
GODOWN COMPANY LIMITED
3rd Plaintiff
ERIC CUMINE ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTS, ENGINEERS & SURVEYORS (a firm)
1st Defendant
J. ROGER PRESTON & PARTNERS (a firm)
2nd Defendant
SHING YIP ENGINEERING COMPANY (a firm)
3rd Defendant
JOHN LOK & PARTNERS LIMITED
4th Defendant
INTRUSION-PREPART (FAR EAST) LIMITED
5th Defendant
THE GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY OF HONG KONG LIMITED
6th Defendant
V.S.L. ENGINEERS (HONG KONG) LIMITED
7th Defendant
THE JARDINE ENGINEERING CORPORATION LIMITED
8th Defendant
AMERICAN ENGINEERING CORPORATION (H.K.) LIMITED
9th Defendant
GILMAN AND COMPANY LIMITED
10th Defendant
ARNHOLD & COMPANY LIMITED
11th Defendant
EMPIRE ENGINEERING COMPANY LIMITED
12th Defendant
RELIANCE ENGINEERING AND TRADING COMPANY LIMITED
13th Defendant
PLASTEEL HONG KONG LIMITED
14th Defendant
SHUN HING ELECTRICAL WORKS AND ENGINEERING COMPANY LIMITED
15th Defendant
MANSION COMPANY (a firm)
16th Defendant
FORTRESS LIMITED
17th Defendant
JOHNSON CONTROLS (HONG KONG) LIMITED
18th Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Contract and Tort (construction Subcontract) / Interlocutory Application to Strike Out Parts of Statement of Claim
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a Certificate of Final Sub-Contract Completion in the Side Agreement is conclusive against the employer/plaintiff in respect of contractual claims relating to the Sub-Contract Works
- 2 Whether that Certificate is also conclusive in relation to tort claims where the tortious duty arises out of the contractual relationship and same facts
- 3 Whether the court may decide the contractual construction on a strike-out application at interlocutory stage
Ratio Decidendi
The Side Agreements' Certificate of Final Sub-Contract Completion, by its clear and comprehensive wording, was conclusive that the sub-contractor had duly performed all obligations in respect of the Sub-Contract Works and therefore barred the plaintiffs' contractual claims; because the alleged tort duty arose from and was co-extensive with the contractual duties, the certificate equally barred the tort claims; the court may decide such pure points of contractual construction on a strike-out application when all material facts are undisputed.
Court Disposition
Application allowed. Statement of Claim struck out as against the 8th defendant; action dismissed as against the 8th defendant with costs.
Orders
- Strike out the parts of the Statement of Claim concerning the 8th defendant
- Action dismissed as against the 8th defendant with costs to the 8th defendant
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment