NG KWOK PIU PHILIP AND OTHERS v. TO PUI KUI AND OTHERS
No sufficient cause was shown to vary earlier orders limiting expert handwriting evidence; the consolidated actions were prepared and tried on that basis, live witnesses can be cross-examined, the proposed fresh expert evidence was unnecessary for determination of the remaining actions and allowing it would be unfair, duplicative and contrary to procedural economy; accordingly the summons for leave to adduce expert evidence was dismissed.
- Citation
- NG KWOK PIU PHILIP AND OTHERS v. TO PUI KUI AND OTHERS
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff in HCA 51/2007; 4th Defendant in HCA 1040/2009; 4th Defendant in HCA 1041/2009: Ng Kwok Piu Philip; 2nd Plaintiff in HCA 51/2007; 2nd Defendant in HCA 1040/2009; 2nd Defendant in HCA 1041/2009; 1st Plaintiff in HCA 188/2010: Confederated Assets Group Limited; 3rd Plaintiff in HCA 51/2007; 3rd Defendant in HCA 1040/2009; 3rd Defendant in HCA 1041/2009; 2nd Plaintiff in HCA 188/2010: Well Arts Enterprises Limited; 1st Defendant in HCA 51/2007; 1st Plaintiff in HCA 1040/2009; 1st Plaintiff in HCA 1041/2009; 2nd Defendant in HCA 188/2010: To Pui Kui; 2nd Defendant in HCA 51/2007; 3rd Plaintiff in HCA 1040/2009; 4th Plaintiff in HCA 1041/2009: Ng Kwok Tai Andrew; 3rd Defendant in HCA 51/2007; 2nd Plaintiff in HCA 1040/2009; 2nd Plaintiff in HCA 1041/2009: Ng Yiu Chi Eleanor; 4th Defendant in HCA 51/2007: Ng Sheung Ming Association Limited; 1st Defendant in HCA 1040/2009: Hultucktong Commercial & Industrial Company Limited; 1st Defendant in HCA 1041/2009: Hultucktong Company Limited; 5th Defendant in HCA 1040/2009; 5th Defendant in HCA 1041/2009: Ng Oi Che Stephanie; 3rd Plaintiff in HCA 1041/2009: Ng Kay Chee Angela; 1st Defendant in HCA 188/2010: Ng Kwok Ching; 3rd Plaintiff in HCA 188/2010: Auto-Express Services Limited; 3rd Defendant in HCA 188/2010: Ng Wing Kai Victor; 4th Defendant in HCA 188/2010: Wington Development Limited; 5th Defendant in HCA 188/2010: La Casa Tabaquera Limited; 6th Defendant in HCA 188/2010: Excellent Best Development Limited
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 6 March 2014
- Case Number
- HCA51/2007
- Procedural Posture
- Consolidated Civil Actions (commercial/company/share Dispute) / Directions Hearing and Interlocutory Decision on Summons for Leave to Adduce Expert Handwriting Evidence; Judgment on Application Delivered
- Outcome
- Summons dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Consolidation, Expert Evidence, Handwriting Verification, Issue Estoppel, Case Management, Leave to Adduce Evidence, Procedural Economy
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ng Kwok Piu Philip
1st Plaintiff in HCA 51/2007; 4th Defendant in HCA 1040/2009; 4th Defendant in HCA 1041/2009
Confederated Assets Group Limited
2nd Plaintiff in HCA 51/2007; 2nd Defendant in HCA 1040/2009; 2nd Defendant in HCA 1041/2009; 1st Plaintiff in HCA 188/2010
Well Arts Enterprises Limited
3rd Plaintiff in HCA 51/2007; 3rd Defendant in HCA 1040/2009; 3rd Defendant in HCA 1041/2009; 2nd Plaintiff in HCA 188/2010
To Pui Kui
1st Defendant in HCA 51/2007; 1st Plaintiff in HCA 1040/2009; 1st Plaintiff in HCA 1041/2009; 2nd Defendant in HCA 188/2010
Ng Kwok Tai Andrew
2nd Defendant in HCA 51/2007; 3rd Plaintiff in HCA 1040/2009; 4th Plaintiff in HCA 1041/2009
Ng Yiu Chi Eleanor
3rd Defendant in HCA 51/2007; 2nd Plaintiff in HCA 1040/2009; 2nd Plaintiff in HCA 1041/2009
Ng Sheung Ming Association Limited
4th Defendant in HCA 51/2007
Hultucktong Commercial & Industrial Company Limited
1st Defendant in HCA 1040/2009
Hultucktong Company Limited
1st Defendant in HCA 1041/2009
Ng Oi Che Stephanie
5th Defendant in HCA 1040/2009; 5th Defendant in HCA 1041/2009
Ng Kay Chee Angela
3rd Plaintiff in HCA 1041/2009
Ng Kwok Ching
1st Defendant in HCA 188/2010
Auto-Express Services Limited
3rd Plaintiff in HCA 188/2010
Ng Wing Kai Victor
3rd Defendant in HCA 188/2010
Wington Development Limited
4th Defendant in HCA 188/2010
La Casa Tabaquera Limited
5th Defendant in HCA 188/2010
Excellent Best Development Limited
6th Defendant in HCA 188/2010
Procedural Posture
Consolidated Civil Actions (commercial/company/share Dispute) / Directions Hearing and Interlocutory Decision on Summons for Leave to Adduce Expert Handwriting Evidence; Judgment on Application Delivered
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether sufficient cause existed to vary prior directions limiting expert handwriting evidence to signatures of the deceased Father under Order 38 r 44 RHC
- 2 Whether expert handwriting evidence on signatures of live witnesses was necessary or justified at this stage
- 3 Whether allowing fresh expert evidence would be unfair or defeat consolidation and procedural economy
Ratio Decidendi
No sufficient cause was shown to vary earlier orders limiting expert handwriting evidence; the consolidated actions were prepared and tried on that basis, live witnesses can be cross-examined, the proposed fresh expert evidence was unnecessary for determination of the remaining actions and allowing it would be unfair, duplicative and contrary to procedural economy; accordingly the summons for leave to adduce expert evidence was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Summons dismissed
Orders
- Summons for leave to adduce expert handwriting evidence dismissed
- Costs to be paid by Philip's camp with certificate for 2 Counsel
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment