NGUYEN QUANG HIEN AND OTHERS v. TORTURE CLAIMS APPEAL BOARD / NON-REFOULEMENT CLAIMS PETITION OFFICE [Decision on Leave Application]
Consolidation was ordered because the Board's Decision addressed common familial facts and consolidation avoids duplication of appeals and costs; on the merits the Board had considered each applicant's case, found the core factual account to be invented, the daughter had earlier legal representation and no specific...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] HKCFI 672
- Parties
- 1st Applicant: Nguyen Quang Hien; 2nd Applicant: Nguyen Lan Huong; 3rd Applicant: Nguyen Thu Hang; Putative Respondent: Torture Claims Appeal Board/Non-refoulement Claims Petition Office; Putative Interested Party: Director of Immigration
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 23 March 2021
- Case Number
- HCAL1289/2018
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Apply for Judicial Review / Consideration on Papers (order 53 R.3)
- Outcome
- Application for leave to apply for judicial review refused; matter consolidated with HCAL 1660/2018; directions given regarding Form Call-1 and appeal rights.
- Legal Topics
- Consolidation of Proceedings, Leave to Apply for Judicial Review, Appeal and Extension of Time, Treatment of Minors/disabled Persons in Immigration Proceedings
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nguyen Quang Hien
1st Applicant
Nguyen Lan Huong
2nd Applicant
Nguyen Thu Hang
3rd Applicant
Torture Claims Appeal Board/Non-refoulement Claims Petition Office
Putative Respondent
Director of Immigration
Putative Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Apply for Judicial Review / Consideration on Papers (order 53 R.3)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the husband applicant's leave application should be consolidated with HCAL 1660/2018
- 2 Whether the 3rd applicant's (disabled daughter) leave application discloses arguable grounds requiring remittance for rehearing
- 3 Whether the Board afforded fair consideration to the applicants' non-refoulement claims
Ratio Decidendi
Consolidation was ordered because the Board's Decision addressed common familial facts and consolidation avoids duplication of appeals and costs; on the merits the Board had considered each applicant's case, found the core factual account to be invented, the daughter had earlier legal representation and no specific unconsidered grounds were shown, therefore the leave applications lacked merit and must be dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to apply for judicial review refused; matter consolidated with HCAL 1660/2018; directions given regarding Form Call-1 and appeal rights.
Orders
- This matter consolidates with HCAL 1660 of 2018 and the husband is named 1st applicant, wife 2nd applicant and daughter 3rd applicant
- The application for extension of time to appeal in HCAL 1660 of 2018 is stayed with liberty to apply
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment