HONG KONG BANK TRUSTEE LTD. AND ANOTHER v. FU CHUI YING AND OTHERS
On construction of the will in light of surrounding circumstances and contemporaneous instructions, 'Oxfam Ethopia Fund' referred to Oxfam Hong Kong (the Company) and the residuary gifts were valid gifts to the Company earmarked for its charitable work in Ethiopia; contemporaneous written instructions were admissible to resolve factual ambiguity and the falsa demonstratio principle applied to the misdescription.
- Citation
- HONG KONG BANK TRUSTEE LTD. AND ANOTHER v. FU CHUI YING AND OTHERS
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: HONG KONG BANK TRUSTEE LIMITED; 2nd Plaintiff: HONG KONG BANK INTERNATIONAL TRUSTEE LIMITED; 1st Defendant: FU CHUI YING; 2nd Defendant: WONG WAI BUN; 3rd Defendant: WONG CHI BUN; 4th Defendant: WONG CHI FONG; 5th Defendant: WONG MUI FONG; 6th Defendant: WONG MAN LAI; 7th Defendant: WONG WAI LAI; 8th Defendant: WONG WAI KUK; 9th Defendant: OXFAM HONG KONG; 10th Defendant: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 20 May 1994
- Case Number
- HCMP1754/1993
- Procedural Posture
- Will Construction / Judgment on Construction Summons
- Outcome
- Declared that the gifts in Clauses 6(c)(i) and 6(c)(ii) to 'The Oxfam Ethopia Fund' are valid gifts to Oxfam Hong Kong, earmarked for its charitable work in Ethiopia.
- Legal Topics
- Construction of Will, Falsa Demonstratio, Admissibility of Extrinsic Evidence to Identify Legatee, Charitable Gifts and Earmarking, Presumption Against Intestacy
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
HONG KONG BANK TRUSTEE LIMITED
1st Plaintiff
HONG KONG BANK INTERNATIONAL TRUSTEE LIMITED
2nd Plaintiff
FU CHUI YING
1st Defendant
WONG WAI BUN
2nd Defendant
WONG CHI BUN
3rd Defendant
WONG CHI FONG
4th Defendant
WONG MUI FONG
5th Defendant
WONG MAN LAI
6th Defendant
WONG WAI LAI
7th Defendant
WONG WAI KUK
8th Defendant
OXFAM HONG KONG
9th Defendant
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
10th Defendant
Procedural Posture
Will Construction / Judgment on Construction Summons
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the residuary bequest to 'Oxfam Ethopia Fund' referred to an existing legal entity or lapsed because the named entity did not exist
- 2 Whether extrinsic written instructions of the testator are admissible to resolve ambiguity as to the identity of the legatee
- 3 Whether the false description (misspelling/misdescription) vitiates the gift or can be rectified by application of falsa demonstratio
Ratio Decidendi
On construction of the will in light of surrounding circumstances and contemporaneous instructions, 'Oxfam Ethopia Fund' referred to Oxfam Hong Kong (the Company) and the residuary gifts were valid gifts to the Company earmarked for its charitable work in Ethiopia; contemporaneous written instructions were admissible to resolve factual ambiguity and the falsa demonstratio principle applied to the misdescription.
Court Disposition
Declared that the gifts in Clauses 6(c)(i) and 6(c)(ii) to 'The Oxfam Ethopia Fund' are valid gifts to Oxfam Hong Kong, earmarked for its charitable work in Ethiopia.
Orders
- Declaration that the residuary bequests to 'The Oxfam Ethopia Fund' are valid as gifts to Oxfam Hong Kong for its Ethiopia work
- Order nisi that all parties are to have their costs from the estate, taxed on a common fund basis
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment