CHAN WAI MING AND ANOTHER v. CHAN WAI LUN AND OTHERS
The court was not satisfied on the balance of probabilities that (a) there was an agreement that the 1st defendant would carry on the businesses as trustee for the estate or family, or (b) that the 1st defendant purchased the suit premises with business or estate funds; consequently no constructive trust arose and, in any event, the plaintiffs' claim for an account was time‑barred under the Limitation Ordinance; therefore the action was dismissed.
- Citation
- CHAN WAI MING AND ANOTHER v. CHAN WAI LUN AND OTHERS
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: CHAN WAI MING; 2nd Plaintiff: CHAN WAI CHIU; 1st Defendant: CHAN WAI LUN; 2nd Defendant: Personal Representatives of Man So (deceased); 3rd Defendant: Personal Representatives of Chan King Ho (deceased); 4th Defendant: CHAN TSUN HO; 5th Defendant: CHAN WAI CHEONG; 6th Defendant: CHAN WAI MAN; 7th Defendant: CHAN PING HO; 8th Defendant: CHAN SIU HO
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 15 January 2002
- Case Number
- HCMP775/1995
- Procedural Posture
- Trust and Estate Dispute (constructive Trust Claim Arising From Intestacy and Partnership Issues) / Judgment (court of First Instance, Deputy High Court Judge Muttrie, 15 January 2002)
- Outcome
- Action dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Constructive Trust, Administration of Intestate Estate, Partnership Dissolution and Rights of Deceased Partner, Limitation Period for Claims to Estate, Accounting by Administrators
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
CHAN WAI MING
1st Plaintiff
CHAN WAI CHIU
2nd Plaintiff
CHAN WAI LUN
1st Defendant
Personal Representatives of Man So (deceased)
2nd Defendant
Personal Representatives of Chan King Ho (deceased)
3rd Defendant
CHAN TSUN HO
4th Defendant
CHAN WAI CHEONG
5th Defendant
CHAN WAI MAN
6th Defendant
CHAN PING HO
7th Defendant
CHAN SIU HO
8th Defendant
Procedural Posture
Trust and Estate Dispute (constructive Trust Claim Arising From Intestacy and Partnership Issues) / Judgment (court of First Instance, Deputy High Court Judge Muttrie, 15 January 2002)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the 1st defendant held the suit premises on constructive trust for the estate/beneficiaries
- 2 Whether the beneficiaries agreed that the 1st defendant would carry on the businesses as trustee for the family/estate
- 3 Whether the suit premises were purchased with business or estate funds
Ratio Decidendi
The court was not satisfied on the balance of probabilities that (a) there was an agreement that the 1st defendant would carry on the businesses as trustee for the estate or family, or (b) that the 1st defendant purchased the suit premises with business or estate funds; consequently no constructive trust arose and, in any event, the plaintiffs' claim for an account was time‑barred under the Limitation Ordinance; therefore the action was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Action dismissed
Orders
- Action dismissed with costs (nisi) to the 1st plaintiff to be taxed if not agreed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment