WONG LEUNG WING, a mentally incapacitated person, suing by his wife and next friend TSOI PUI WAH v. WANG JEN KANG AND ANOTHER
The court found on the balance of credible oral testimony and contemporaneous documentary evidence (PSPA, PC receipt, OUB mortgage/offer, WLW's housing declarations and supporting witnesses Lam and D1) that the 1992 transaction was a genuine sale and purchase for HK$1.2m, not a trust; the statement of claim did not disclose a reasonable cause of action against the 2nd defendant; P's key witnesses were unreliable and certain hearsay/deceased statements were admissible and supported D1's case; accordingly the plaintiff's claim was dismissed and the discretionary declaration was refused.
- Citation
- [2020] HKCFI 3086
- Parties
- Plaintiff (mentally Incapacitated Person): Wong Leung Wing; Next Friend / Wife of Plaintiff: Tsoi Pui Wah; 1st Defendant: Wang Jen Kang; 2nd Defendant: Hui Lai Nai
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 16 December 2020
- Case Number
- HCA3021/2015
- Procedural Posture
- Action Beneficial Ownership / Trust Dispute / Judgment (court of First Instance)
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Constructive Trust, Resulting Trust, Express Trust, Beneficial Ownership, Pleadings, Illegality / Public Policy, Witness Credibility and Contemporaneous Documents, Order 39 Depositions, Declaratory Relief
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Wong Leung Wing
Plaintiff (mentally Incapacitated Person)
Tsoi Pui Wah
Next Friend / Wife of Plaintiff
Wang Jen Kang
1st Defendant
Hui Lai Nai
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Action Beneficial Ownership / Trust Dispute / Judgment (court of First Instance)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the 1992 transaction was a trust arrangement or a genuine sale and purchase
- 2 Whether a reasonable cause of action was pleaded against the 2nd defendant
- 3 Admissibility and weight of hearsay / deceased witness statements and MIP statements
Ratio Decidendi
The court found on the balance of credible oral testimony and contemporaneous documentary evidence (PSPA, PC receipt, OUB mortgage/offer, WLW's housing declarations and supporting witnesses Lam and D1) that the 1992 transaction was a genuine sale and purchase for HK$1.2m, not a trust; the statement of claim did not disclose a reasonable cause of action against the 2nd defendant; P's key witnesses were unreliable and certain hearsay/deceased statements were admissible and supported D1's case; accordingly the plaintiff's claim was dismissed and the discretionary declaration was refused.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Orders
- Claim dismissed
- Costs to defendants; costs order nisi that costs of these proceedings be paid by plaintiff to defendants, to be taxed if not agreed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment