HWANG JOON SANG AND ANOTHER v. GOLDEN ELECTRONICS INC. AND OTHERS
The Court held that, in the circumstances of extensive documentary material and defendants who had attempted to evade service, it was appropriate to grant leave to serve future non-originating documents on specified defendants by providing a court-approved link to an online data room together with a separate access code and instructions, because this method satisfies the rules' underlying objectives, constitutes effective notice, and is proportionate and secure; the Court also found earlier service attempts in Taiwan effective despite returned parcels and continued interim injunctions against most named defendants.
- Citation
- [2020] HKCFI 1084
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: Hwang Joon Sang; 2nd Plaintiff: Future Cell Plus Co., Ltd; 1st Defendant: Golden Electronics Inc.; 2nd Defendant: Worldbest Global Supplier Inc.; 3rd Defendant: Harmony Electronics Inc.; 4th Defendant: Quantum Electronics Inc.; 5th Defendant: Jin Miao International Limited; 6th Defendant: Vivien Chung Ying-Yin; 7th Defendant: Magic Electronics Inc.; 8th Defendant: B.C Century Techoology Limited; 9th Defendant: Chen Nien Fang; 10th Defendant: Chen Yi Kuei; 11th Defendant: China Dynamic Limited; 12th Defendant: Chiu Wei Fen; 13th Defendant: Chou Lin Chiao; 14th Defendant: Glory Dynamic Limited; 15th Defendant: Hsu Wei Lun; 16th Defendant: Hu Hong Bin; 17th Defendant: Imperial Dragon Limited; 18th Defendant: Lin Chih Cheng; 19th Defendant: Liu Mei Ting; 20th Defendant: Magic Crystal Limited; 21st Defendant: Niu Hsiu Chen; 22nd Defendant: Su Chao Ming; 23rd Defendant: Su Kuang Hong; 24th Defendant: Su Pei I; 25th Defendant: Tsai Pao Tsai; 26th Defendant: Wang Chao Cheng; 27th Defendant: Wang Hui Min; 28th Defendant: Chou Pei Fen
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 9 June 2020
- Case Number
- HCA1529/2019
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Action for Proprietary Remedies (constructive Trust, Account) With Interlocutory Injunctions / Interlocutory Application to Continue Interim Injunctions and for Leave to Effect Future Service by Data Room Under RHC Order 65 R 5(1)(d)
- Outcome
- Leave granted to plaintiffs to effect future service on D10, D11, D14, D17, D19, D20, D21, D22, D23, D24, D26, D27 and D28 by access to a court-approved data room; interim injunctions continued against specified defendants except where service not effective (D25) or proceedings discontinued (D8).
- Legal Topics
- Constructive Trust, Service by Data Room, Order 65 Rule 5, Case Management, Service Out of Jurisdiction, Interim Relief
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hwang Joon Sang
1st Plaintiff
Future Cell Plus Co., Ltd
2nd Plaintiff
Golden Electronics Inc.
1st Defendant
Worldbest Global Supplier Inc.
2nd Defendant
Harmony Electronics Inc.
3rd Defendant
Quantum Electronics Inc.
4th Defendant
Jin Miao International Limited
5th Defendant
Vivien Chung Ying-Yin
6th Defendant
Magic Electronics Inc.
7th Defendant
B.C Century Techoology Limited
8th Defendant
Chen Nien Fang
9th Defendant
Chen Yi Kuei
10th Defendant
China Dynamic Limited
11th Defendant
Chiu Wei Fen
12th Defendant
Chou Lin Chiao
13th Defendant
Glory Dynamic Limited
14th Defendant
Hsu Wei Lun
15th Defendant
Hu Hong Bin
16th Defendant
Imperial Dragon Limited
17th Defendant
Lin Chih Cheng
18th Defendant
Liu Mei Ting
19th Defendant
Magic Crystal Limited
20th Defendant
Niu Hsiu Chen
21st Defendant
Su Chao Ming
22nd Defendant
Su Kuang Hong
23rd Defendant
Su Pei I
24th Defendant
Tsai Pao Tsai
25th Defendant
Wang Chao Cheng
26th Defendant
Wang Hui Min
27th Defendant
Chou Pei Fen
28th Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Action for Proprietary Remedies (constructive Trust, Account) With Interlocutory Injunctions / Interlocutory Application to Continue Interim Injunctions and for Leave to Effect Future Service by Data Room Under RHC Order 65 R 5(1)(d)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether service by access to a court-approved data room is an authorised and effective mode of service under RHC Order 65 r 5(1)(d)
- 2 Whether previous attempts at service in Taiwan were effective despite returned parcels
- 3 Whether the interim injunction should be continued against specified defendants
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held that, in the circumstances of extensive documentary material and defendants who had attempted to evade service, it was appropriate to grant leave to serve future non-originating documents on specified defendants by providing a court-approved link to an online data room together with a separate access code and instructions, because this method satisfies the rules' underlying objectives, constitutes effective notice, and is proportionate and secure; the Court also found earlier service attempts in Taiwan effective despite returned parcels and continued interim injunctions against most named defendants.
Court Disposition
Leave granted to plaintiffs to effect future service on D10, D11, D14, D17, D19, D20, D21, D22, D23, D24, D26, D27 and D28 by access to a court-approved data room; interim injunctions continued against specified defendants except where service not effective (D25) or proceedings discontinued (D8).
Orders
- Interim injunction continued against D7, D10, D11, D13, D14, D15, D17, D19, D20, D21, D22, D23, D24, D26, D27 and D28 (except D25 and D8 as noted)
- Leave granted to plaintiffs to serve future documents on D10, D11, D14, D17, D19, D20, D21, D22, D23, D24, D26, D27 and D28 by access to a data room
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment