WONG MAN SUM v. WONDERLAND SEA FOOD RESTAURANT O/B LONG YIELD CO LTD

WONG MAN SUM v. WONDERLAND SEA FOOD RESTAURANT O/B LONG YIELD CO LTD

Where a short intermission between successive fixed‑term contracts exists, continuity will be preserved and severance remain payable if the tribunal is satisfied the break was part of an employer scheme or mutual arrangement to avoid statutory liabilities; the tribunal's factual findings on that point are decisive and will not be disturbed on appeal.

Citation
WONG MAN SUM v. WONDERLAND SEA FOOD RESTAURANT O/B LONG YIELD CO LTD
Parties
Claimant / Respondent: WONG MAN SUM; Appellant / Defendant: WONDERLAND SEA FOOD RESTAURANT O/B LONG YIELD CO. LTD
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
10 June 2005
Case Number
HCLA133/2002
Procedural Posture
Labour Tribunal Appeal (high Court of the Hong Kong Sar, Court of First Instance) / Judgment on Appeal (hearing Ex Parte; Official Receiver/trustee in Bankruptcy Did Not Participate)
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; Labour Tribunal award upheld
Legal Topics
Continuous Employment, Severance Payment, Dismissal, Redundancy, Statutory Interpretation, Mutual Arrangement/avoidance Schemes
Source Language
EN
Employment Law Labour Law Contract Law Bankruptcy (incidental) Continuous Employment Severance Payment Dismissal Redundancy +2 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

WONG MAN SUM

Claimant / Respondent

WONDERLAND SEA FOOD RESTAURANT O/B LONG YIELD CO. LTD

Appellant / Defendant

Procedural Posture

Labour Tribunal Appeal (high Court of the Hong Kong Sar, Court of First Instance) / Judgment on Appeal (hearing Ex Parte; Official Receiver/trustee in Bankruptcy Did Not Participate)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether two successive fixed‑term employment contracts separated by a 16‑day break constitute continuous employment for purposes of severance under s.31B Employment Ordinance
  2. 2 Whether the short break was a genuine break or part of an employer scheme/ mutual arrangement to avoid severance liability
  3. 3 Whether the employee was validly dismissed and entitled to severance payment

Ratio Decidendi

Where a short intermission between successive fixed‑term contracts exists, continuity will be preserved and severance remain payable if the tribunal is satisfied the break was part of an employer scheme or mutual arrangement to avoid statutory liabilities; the tribunal's factual findings on that point are decisive and will not be disturbed on appeal.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; Labour Tribunal award upheld

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed
  • Labour Tribunal award upheld including severance payment of HK$12,565.80 to the respondent