ALVAREZ & MARSAL ASIA LTD v. NICHOLAS TIMOTHY CORNFORTH HILL
The ATA and LAIL Agreement created new monetary debts (FADD and SLD) owing by A&M Asia that were assigned to Hill and thus enforceable by him; where no payment terms are given such debts are payable on demand; 'net book value' in the ATA is to be interpreted as the nominal book value at completion (not merely recoverable value) and the SLD was quantified at HK$20,127,885; collections of monies from ongoing jobs must be applied first to discharge RSM Corporate accounts receivable (earliest debtor first); payments of US$800,000 to the two departing shareholders were repayments of shareholder borrowings on commercial terms and hence excluded from the 80% subordination requirement.
- Citation
- ALVAREZ & MARSAL ASIA LTD v. NICHOLAS TIMOTHY CORNFORTH HILL
- Parties
- Plaintiff in HCA 56/2007 and Defendant in HCMP 2461/2006: Nicholas Timothy Cornforth Hill; Defendant in HCA 56/2007 and Plaintiff in HCMP 2461/2006: Alvarez & Marsal Asia Limited
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 23 December 2008
- Case Number
- HCMP2461/2006
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Dispute Concerning Contract Interpretation, Company and Partnership Arrangements / Interim Judgment After Trial Hearing
- Outcome
- Interim judgment: plaintiff Hill succeeds on core contract interpretation points — A&M Asia liable for FADD and SLD, SLD quantified and payable on demand, receipts to be applied earliest-debtor-first; subordinated distribution clause does not capture certain shareholder loan repayments to departing shareholders...
- Legal Topics
- Contract Interpretation, Statutory Demand, Assignment of Debts, Goodwill Payment, Subordination of Distributions, Accounts Receivable Priority, Meaning of Net Book Value
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nicholas Timothy Cornforth Hill
Plaintiff in HCA 56/2007 and Defendant in HCMP 2461/2006
Alvarez & Marsal Asia Limited
Defendant in HCA 56/2007 and Plaintiff in HCMP 2461/2006
Procedural Posture
Civil Dispute Concerning Contract Interpretation, Company and Partnership Arrangements / Interim Judgment After Trial Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether A&M Asia was liable to pay the Fixed Assets and Deposits Debt (FADD) and the Subsidiaries Loans Debt (SLD)
- 2 Whether the FADD and SLD were payable on demand or subject to a pay-when-paid condition
- 3 Proper construction of 'net book value' for calculation of the SLD
Ratio Decidendi
The ATA and LAIL Agreement created new monetary debts (FADD and SLD) owing by A&M Asia that were assigned to Hill and thus enforceable by him; where no payment terms are given such debts are payable on demand; 'net book value' in the ATA is to be interpreted as the nominal book value at completion (not merely recoverable value) and the SLD was quantified at HK$20,127,885; collections of monies from ongoing jobs must be applied first to discharge RSM Corporate accounts receivable (earliest debtor first); payments of US$800,000 to the two departing shareholders were repayments of shareholder borrowings on commercial terms and hence excluded from the 80% subordination requirement.
Court Disposition
Interim judgment: plaintiff Hill succeeds on core contract interpretation points — A&M Asia liable for FADD and SLD, SLD quantified and payable on demand, receipts to be applied earliest-debtor-first; subordinated distribution clause does not capture certain shareholder loan repayments to departing shareholders...
Orders
- Declared that A&M Asia is liable to pay the Fixed Assets and Deposits Debt (FADD) and the Subsidiaries Loans Debt (SLD) assigned under the ATA/LAIL Agreement
- Declared SLD payable on demand and quantified at HKD 20,127,885 (amount as at Completion Date 30 June 2005)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment