KWAN CHI PUN in his personal capacity and the executor of the estate of Kwan Sui Lin, deceased v. LAI HOI YEE AND ANOTHER
The application to vary the costs order nisi was dismissed and costs awarded to the respondent because ordinary costs principles applied (not the principles for testamentary suits), the applicants pursued a weak and unrealistic case with knowledge of the Will, the respondent made settlement offers, there was no...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- KWAN CHI PUN in his personal capacity and the executor of the estate of Kwan Sui Lin, deceased v. LAI HOI YEE AND ANOTHER
- Parties
- Plaintiff in HCA 557/2014; Personal Representative and Respondent in HCMP 2078/2015: Kwan Chi Pun; 1st Defendant in HCA 557/2014; Applicant in HCMP 2078/2015: Lai Hoi Yee; 2nd Defendant in HCA 557/2014: Lai Kam Ming
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 3 October 2016
- Case Number
- HCA557/2014
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Inheritance/family Provision and Related Actions / Post Judgment Application to Vary Costs Order Nisi (costs Variation Application)
- Outcome
- Application dismissed; costs awarded to respondent Kwan Chi Pun
- Legal Topics
- Costs Order Variation, Application Under S.4 Inheritance Ordinance, Validity and Effect of Will, Request for Property Transfer, Conduct in Litigation Affecting Costs
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kwan Chi Pun
Plaintiff in HCA 557/2014; Personal Representative and Respondent in HCMP 2078/2015
Lai Hoi Yee
1st Defendant in HCA 557/2014; Applicant in HCMP 2078/2015
Lai Kam Ming
2nd Defendant in HCA 557/2014
Procedural Posture
Civil Inheritance/family Provision and Related Actions / Post Judgment Application to Vary Costs Order Nisi (costs Variation Application)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the costs order nisi should be varied to no order as to costs
- 2 Whether principles applicable to testamentary suits (Mitchell v Gard) apply in these actions
- 3 Whether the applicants pursued a weak case despite knowledge of the Will
Ratio Decidendi
The application to vary the costs order nisi was dismissed and costs awarded to the respondent because ordinary costs principles applied (not the principles for testamentary suits), the applicants pursued a weak and unrealistic case with knowledge of the Will, the respondent made settlement offers, there was no respondent misconduct to justify depriving him of costs, and fairness to the respondent given his loss of earning capacity and the small estate required an award of costs to him.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed; costs awarded to respondent Kwan Chi Pun
Orders
- Application dismissed with costs to Kwan Chi Pun
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment