LAW YUET MING LENA, The executrix pf the estate of YU MEI SUN Deceased v. WONG CHUEN PAN also known as WONG PAN KWEI

LAW YUET MING LENA, The executrix pf the estate of YU MEI SUN Deceased v. WONG CHUEN PAN also known as WONG PAN KWEI

On the pleaded facts the court was satisfied that the elements of a common intention constructive trust were established and that there was a genuine need to grant declaratory relief despite the defendant's default; further, because the trustee/registered owner is out of the jurisdiction or cannot be found it was expedient to make a vesting order under the Trustee Ordinance to give effect to the declaration and enable the executrix to deal with the Property.

Citation
[2026] HKCFI 745
Parties
Plaintiff / Executrix: P (executrix of the estate of Madam Yu Mei Sun); Defendant: D
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
26 January 2026
Case Number
HCA2831/2015
Procedural Posture
Civil Property Dispute (declaration of Beneficial Ownership / Vesting Order) / Application for Default Judgment and Substantive Hearing on Amended Summons (order 19 R 7)
Outcome
Declaration that P is the sole beneficial owner of the Property; vesting order vesting the Property in P under the Trustee Ordinance; costs assessed against D
Legal Topics
Common Intention Constructive Trust, Proprietary (proprietary/promissory) Estoppel, Default Judgment Practice, Vesting Order Under Trustee Ordinance, Declaratory Relief, Limitation/ Adverse Possession
Source Language
EN

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 6 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

P (executrix of the estate of Madam Yu Mei Sun)

Plaintiff / Executrix

D

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Property Dispute (declaration of Beneficial Ownership / Vesting Order) / Application for Default Judgment and Substantive Hearing on Amended Summons (order 19 R 7)

  1. 1 Whether a declaration of sole beneficial ownership should be made in default of defence
  2. 2 Whether common intention constructive trust is established on the pleaded facts
  3. 3 Whether proprietary/proprietary estoppel arises

Ratio Decidendi

On the pleaded facts the court was satisfied that the elements of a common intention constructive trust were established and that there was a genuine need to grant declaratory relief despite the defendant's default; further, because the trustee/registered owner is out of the jurisdiction or cannot be found it was expedient to make a vesting order under the Trustee Ordinance to give effect to the declaration and enable the executrix to deal with the Property.

Court Disposition

Declaration that P is the sole beneficial owner of the Property; vesting order vesting the Property in P under the Trustee Ordinance; costs assessed against D

Orders

  • Declaration that P is the sole beneficial owner of the estate and interest in the Property
  • Order vesting the Property, estate or interest therein in P pursuant to Trustee Ordinance (Cap 29) s45(b)(iii) and (g)