LAW YUET MING LENA, The executrix pf the estate of YU MEI SUN Deceased v. WONG CHUEN PAN also known as WONG PAN KWEI
On the pleaded facts the court was satisfied that the elements of a common intention constructive trust were established and that there was a genuine need to grant declaratory relief despite the defendant's default; further, because the trustee/registered owner is out of the jurisdiction or cannot be found it was expedient to make a vesting order under the Trustee Ordinance to give effect to the declaration and enable the executrix to deal with the Property.
- Citation
- [2026] HKCFI 745
- Parties
- Plaintiff / Executrix: P (executrix of the estate of Madam Yu Mei Sun); Defendant: D
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 26 January 2026
- Case Number
- HCA2831/2015
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Property Dispute (declaration of Beneficial Ownership / Vesting Order) / Application for Default Judgment and Substantive Hearing on Amended Summons (order 19 R 7)
- Outcome
- Declaration that P is the sole beneficial owner of the Property; vesting order vesting the Property in P under the Trustee Ordinance; costs assessed against D
- Legal Topics
- Common Intention Constructive Trust, Proprietary (proprietary/promissory) Estoppel, Default Judgment Practice, Vesting Order Under Trustee Ordinance, Declaratory Relief, Limitation/ Adverse Possession
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
P (executrix of the estate of Madam Yu Mei Sun)
Plaintiff / Executrix
D
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Property Dispute (declaration of Beneficial Ownership / Vesting Order) / Application for Default Judgment and Substantive Hearing on Amended Summons (order 19 R 7)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a declaration of sole beneficial ownership should be made in default of defence
- 2 Whether common intention constructive trust is established on the pleaded facts
- 3 Whether proprietary/proprietary estoppel arises
Ratio Decidendi
On the pleaded facts the court was satisfied that the elements of a common intention constructive trust were established and that there was a genuine need to grant declaratory relief despite the defendant's default; further, because the trustee/registered owner is out of the jurisdiction or cannot be found it was expedient to make a vesting order under the Trustee Ordinance to give effect to the declaration and enable the executrix to deal with the Property.
Court Disposition
Declaration that P is the sole beneficial owner of the Property; vesting order vesting the Property in P under the Trustee Ordinance; costs assessed against D
Orders
- Declaration that P is the sole beneficial owner of the estate and interest in the Property
- Order vesting the Property, estate or interest therein in P pursuant to Trustee Ordinance (Cap 29) s45(b)(iii) and (g)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment