DAVID CHIEN v. FRANCIS CHEUNG AND OTHERS
There was a serious question to be tried that the directors approved a disposal of the company's principal asset at an undervalue and in breach of their fiduciary duties, the plaintiff (having become a registered member) was entitled to interlocutory relief, and an interim quia timet injunction should be granted restraining completion of the sale pending determination of the leave application under s168BC or further order.
- Citation
- DAVID CHIEN v. FRANCIS CHEUNG AND OTHERS
- Parties
- Plaintiff: David Chien; 1st Defendant: Francis Cheung; 2nd Defendant: Jennifer Kwok; 3rd Defendant: Chiu Chin Hung; 4th Defendant: Wong Kay; 5th Defendant: Lau Kin Fai; 6th Defendant: Harvey Jackel Cheung; 7th Defendant: Fan Chor Ho Paul; 8th Defendant: Tse Man Bun; 9th Defendant: Lung Chee Ming George; Respondent (hcmp 841/2013): Tysan Holdings Limited
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 7 June 2013
- Case Number
- HCMP2892/2012
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Interim Injunction Under Section 350 B of the Companies Ordinance and Application for Leave to Bring Statutory Derivative Proceedings Under Section 168 BC / Interlocutory Hearing (injunction Granted Pending Determination of Leave Application)
- Outcome
- Interim injunction granted; defendants' strike‑out summons dismissed; costs ordered against defendants
- Legal Topics
- Interim Injunction, Derivative Proceedings, Connected Party Transaction, Undervalue Disposal, Breach of Directors' Duties, Conflict of Interest, Shareholders' Approval
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
David Chien
Plaintiff
Francis Cheung
1st Defendant
Jennifer Kwok
2nd Defendant
Chiu Chin Hung
3rd Defendant
Wong Kay
4th Defendant
Lau Kin Fai
5th Defendant
Harvey Jackel Cheung
6th Defendant
Fan Chor Ho Paul
7th Defendant
Tse Man Bun
8th Defendant
Lung Chee Ming George
9th Defendant
Tysan Holdings Limited
Respondent (hcmp 841/2013)
Procedural Posture
Application for Interim Injunction Under Section 350 B of the Companies Ordinance and Application for Leave to Bring Statutory Derivative Proceedings Under Section 168 BC / Interlocutory Hearing (injunction Granted Pending Determination of Leave Application)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there is a serious question to be tried that directors approved disposal at undervalue and breached fiduciary duties
- 2 Whether the court may grant interim relief under section 350B and inherent jurisdiction pending leave for derivative proceedings under section 168BC
- 3 Whether plaintiff had standing/member status to seek relief
Ratio Decidendi
There was a serious question to be tried that the directors approved a disposal of the company's principal asset at an undervalue and in breach of their fiduciary duties, the plaintiff (having become a registered member) was entitled to interlocutory relief, and an interim quia timet injunction should be granted restraining completion of the sale pending determination of the leave application under s168BC or further order.
Court Disposition
Interim injunction granted; defendants' strike‑out summons dismissed; costs ordered against defendants
Orders
- Injunction restraining the defendants from directly or indirectly engaging in any act or conduct to secure completion of the sale under the Agreement for Sale and Purchase of Shares in Tysan Foundation (Hong Kong) Limited dated 12 November 2012 and the Supplemental Agreement dated 21 December 2012 until...
- The defendants' summons (24 January 2013) to strike out the 1st Originating Summons is dismissed with costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment