WONG SUN KEUNG AND ANOTHER v. LABOUR BUILDINGS LTD AND OTHERS
The court found that on the evidence LBL was indebted to Winland as at the date of hearing and therefore the receivers had been properly appointed and possessed the necessary powers under the debenture to carry out the acts sought; accordingly the application by the receivers was granted and costs were ordered to be paid out of LBL's assets. The deed provision relied upon did not conclusively negate Winland's remaining claims.
- Citation
- WONG SUN KEUNG AND ANOTHER v. LABOUR BUILDINGS LTD AND OTHERS
- Parties
- Plaintiffs (joint and Several Receivers and Managers of No.11 Changsha Street, Mongkok, Kowloon): WONG SUN KEUNG; TSUI MEI YUK, JANICE; 1st Defendant: LABOUR BUILDINGS LIMITED; 2nd Defendant (designated Purchaser Under Provisional Agreement): STAR RAINBOW; 3rd Defendant (lender Under Debenture): WINLAND
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 3 February 2010
- Case Number
- HCMP2544/2009
- Procedural Posture
- Receivership / Inherent Jurisdiction Application Under Rules of the High Court / Application Hearing and Reasons for Decision (order Granted)
- Outcome
- Application granted
- Legal Topics
- Debenture, Legal Charge/mortgage, Appointment of Receivers, Tracing Assets, Settlement Clause, Conflict of Interest, Inquiry Into Asset Diversion
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
WONG SUN KEUNG; TSUI MEI YUK, JANICE
Plaintiffs (joint and Several Receivers and Managers of No.11 Changsha Street, Mongkok, Kowloon)
LABOUR BUILDINGS LIMITED
1st Defendant
STAR RAINBOW
2nd Defendant (designated Purchaser Under Provisional Agreement)
WINLAND
3rd Defendant (lender Under Debenture)
Procedural Posture
Receivership / Inherent Jurisdiction Application Under Rules of the High Court / Application Hearing and Reasons for Decision (order Granted)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Labour Buildings Limited (LBL) was indebted to Winland as at the date of hearing
- 2 Whether the receivers were validly appointed and possessed the powers under the debenture to perform the acts sought
- 3 Whether clause(s) in the deed dated 10 July 2009 operated as a full and final settlement of Winland's claims
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that on the evidence LBL was indebted to Winland as at the date of hearing and therefore the receivers had been properly appointed and possessed the necessary powers under the debenture to carry out the acts sought; accordingly the application by the receivers was granted and costs were ordered to be paid out of LBL's assets. The deed provision relied upon did not conclusively negate Winland's remaining claims.
Court Disposition
Application granted
Orders
- Application by the plaintiffs (receivers) granted
- Costs to be paid out of the assets of Labour Buildings Limited
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment