CHAN SHU CHUN AND ANOTHER v. DR KUNG YAN SUM AND OTHERS
The plaintiffs failed to discharge the required cogent evidential burden to prove deceit by Dr Kung; consequentially the pleaded unlawful means conspiracy was not established against all defendants; even accepting some suspicious conduct, there was insufficient proof to implicate the Foundation or the Solicitors in knowingly participating in the conspiracy; no damages awarded and costs ordered against the plaintiffs (with indemnity costs limited to abandoned COSCO claims).
- Citation
- [2023] HKCFI 840
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: CHAN SHU CHUN (陳書春); 2nd Plaintiff: KING BASE ENGINEERING LIMITED (卓基工程有限公司); 1st Defendant: DR KUNG YAN SUM (龔仁心); 2nd Defendant: HERO FORTUNE LIMITED (雄福有限公司); 3rd Defendant: CHINACHEM CHARITABLE FOUNDATION LIMITED (華懋慈善基金有限公司); 4th Defendant: MESSRS PHILIP KH WONG, KENNEDY YH WONG & CO
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 18 April 2023
- Case Number
- HCA832/2014
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (deceit, Conspiracy, Conversion) / Judgment (trial Concluded)
- Outcome
- Plaintiffs' claims dismissed on the evidence; no award of damages; costs ordered against Plaintiffs with indemnity costs limited to the abandoned COSCO claims and directions for taxation.
- Legal Topics
- Deceit, Unlawful Means Conspiracy, Dishonesty and Blind Eye Knowledge, Attribution of Director Knowledge to Company, Damages and Costs
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
CHAN SHU CHUN (陳書春)
1st Plaintiff
KING BASE ENGINEERING LIMITED (卓基工程有限公司)
2nd Plaintiff
DR KUNG YAN SUM (龔仁心)
1st Defendant
HERO FORTUNE LIMITED (雄福有限公司)
2nd Defendant
CHINACHEM CHARITABLE FOUNDATION LIMITED (華懋慈善基金有限公司)
3rd Defendant
MESSRS PHILIP KH WONG, KENNEDY YH WONG & CO
4th Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil (deceit, Conspiracy, Conversion) / Judgment (trial Concluded)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Dr Kung made a false representation inducing issue of the HK$50m cheque
- 2 Whether representation was made knowingly false and acted upon (deceit)
- 3 Whether there was a common agreement to injure (conspiracy) involving all defendants
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiffs failed to discharge the required cogent evidential burden to prove deceit by Dr Kung; consequentially the pleaded unlawful means conspiracy was not established against all defendants; even accepting some suspicious conduct, there was insufficient proof to implicate the Foundation or the Solicitors in knowingly participating in the conspiracy; no damages awarded and costs ordered against the plaintiffs (with indemnity costs limited to abandoned COSCO claims).
Court Disposition
Plaintiffs' claims dismissed on the evidence; no award of damages; costs ordered against Plaintiffs with indemnity costs limited to the abandoned COSCO claims and directions for taxation.
Orders
- Costs on the COSCO Claims as against the Foundation to be borne by the Plaintiffs on indemnity basis from 19 May 2017
- Costs of the action to be taxed as if the trial had been fixed for 7 days
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment