LUCKY FACT GARMENTS LTD AND ANOTHER v. KWOK CHI KUEN t/a GLOBAL INTERIOR DESIGN AND ANOTHER
On the balance of probabilities the 1st defendant breached the Main Contract and/or was negligent in performing renovation works and waterproofing, causing the pleaded defects and water seepage; the court accepted the plaintiffs' expert evidence where credible, rejected VO6 and certain defendant contentions, awarded specific remediation and general damages (including loss of enjoyment), set off unpaid contract sums, and ordered the 2nd defendant to refund supervision fees.
- Citation
- [2023] HKDC 972
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: Lucky Fact Garments Limited; 2nd Plaintiff: Wong Kam Hing; 1st Defendant: Kwok Chi Kuen trading as Global Interior Design; 2nd Defendant: Cheung Sin Kwan trading as B2 Interior Design
- Court
- District Court
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 18 July 2023
- Case Number
- DCCJ5742/2019
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Action (construction/contract and Tort Defective Renovation and Water Seepage) / Judgment (trial Level)
- Outcome
- Judgment for plaintiffs. 1st defendant ordered to pay net damages of HKD 289,018.20 to the plaintiffs; 2nd defendant ordered to refund supervision fees of HKD 120,000.00 to the plaintiffs. Costs order nisi that defendants pay 80% of plaintiffs' costs (to be taxed if not agreed) with specific exclusions; various...
- Legal Topics
- Defective Renovation, Water Seepage, Loss of Enjoyment, Expert Evidence, Variation Orders, Damages Assessment, Costs and Set Off
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lucky Fact Garments Limited
1st Plaintiff
Wong Kam Hing
2nd Plaintiff
Kwok Chi Kuen trading as Global Interior Design
1st Defendant
Cheung Sin Kwan trading as B2 Interior Design
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Action (construction/contract and Tort Defective Renovation and Water Seepage) / Judgment (trial Level)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the 2nd plaintiff was a contracting party to the Main Contract
- 2 Whether the 1st defendant breached the Main Contract and/or owed a tortious duty causing the alleged defects
- 3 Whether water seepage occurred and whether it was caused by the 1st defendant's works
Ratio Decidendi
On the balance of probabilities the 1st defendant breached the Main Contract and/or was negligent in performing renovation works and waterproofing, causing the pleaded defects and water seepage; the court accepted the plaintiffs' expert evidence where credible, rejected VO6 and certain defendant contentions, awarded specific remediation and general damages (including loss of enjoyment), set off unpaid contract sums, and ordered the 2nd defendant to refund supervision fees.
Court Disposition
Judgment for plaintiffs. 1st defendant ordered to pay net damages of HKD 289,018.20 to the plaintiffs; 2nd defendant ordered to refund supervision fees of HKD 120,000.00 to the plaintiffs. Costs order nisi that defendants pay 80% of plaintiffs' costs (to be taxed if not agreed) with specific exclusions; various...
Orders
- 1st Defendant to pay plaintiffs HKD 289,018.20 as damages
- Interest on HKD 39,018.20 at 1% above HSBC best lending rate from service of writ to judgment, thereafter at judgment rate until payment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment