CONAL INVESTMENT LTD AND ANOTHER v. YU PUN HOI

CONAL INVESTMENT LTD AND ANOTHER v. YU PUN HOI

The court concluded the Option Deed was intended to have legal effect (signed, sealed, and with manuscript amendments by the defendant) and that the defendant breached the obligation to complete the purchase; the absence of documentary proof of notices was relevant but did not negate the binding nature of the deed and the defendant's admitted failure to complete the transaction.

Citation
[2019] HKCFI 541
Parties
Plaintiffs: Plaintiffs; Investor / Plaintiff: Second Plaintiff; Defendant: Defendant
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
4 March 2019
Case Number
HCA1654/2012
Procedural Posture
Civil Contract / Trial Judgment
Outcome
Findings for plaintiffs on the enforceability of the Option Deed and on defendant's breach of the agreement; relief to follow
Legal Topics
Option Deed, Validity of Notice, Breach of Contract, Gifts Versus Part Payments, Specific Performance
Source Language
EN
Contract Company Law Equity Misrepresentation Evidence Option Deed Validity of Notice Breach of Contract +2 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Plaintiffs

Plaintiffs

Second Plaintiff

Investor / Plaintiff

Defendant

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Contract / Trial Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Option Deed was intended to be legally binding
  2. 2 Whether the option notice was validly served and the option validly exercised
  3. 3 Whether payments from the defendant to the plaintiffs were part payments under the Agreement or gifts

Ratio Decidendi

The court concluded the Option Deed was intended to have legal effect (signed, sealed, and with manuscript amendments by the defendant) and that the defendant breached the obligation to complete the purchase; the absence of documentary proof of notices was relevant but did not negate the binding nature of the deed and the defendant's admitted failure to complete the transaction.

Court Disposition

Findings for plaintiffs on the enforceability of the Option Deed and on defendant's breach of the agreement; relief to follow

Orders

  • Declaration that the Option Deed was intended to be binding
  • Declaration that the defendant breached the Option Deed by failing to complete the purchase