YEUNG PAK KWAN as administrator of the estate of LAM FAN, deceased v. CHEN DECANG
Court accepted plaintiff's quantifications largely as reasonable, adopted an averaging method starting in 1987 to calculate annual accumulation, found the Deceased would have accumulated further wealth to notional retirement, applied no discount for accelerated receipt because defendant's incarceration made payment before retirement unrealizable, awarded specified sums to Steven and Lily for pre‑ and post‑trial dependency and awarded loss of accumulation to the estate, allowed funeral and cinerary expenses, refused to make a bereavement award to survivors because statute prescribes entitlement and the court would not rewrite statutory priority despite public policy concerns, and ordered...
- Citation
- [2022] HKCFI 3605
- Parties
- Plaintiff (administrator/claimant Under Fatal Accidents Ordinance and Larco): Steven Yeung; Defendant: Defendant (unnamed); Deceased: Lam Fan
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 7 December 2022
- Case Number
- HCPI994/2012
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Fatal Accidents and Surviving Cause of Action Under LARCO / Assessment of Damages After Interlocutory Judgment on Liability
- Outcome
- Judgment for plaintiff. Damages assessed and awarded to Steven, Lily and the Estate totalling HKD 35,127,845.28 plus interest; funeral and cinerary expenses allowed; bereavement claim not awarded to survivors; costs order nisi made against defendant (certificate for two counsel) to be taxed if not agreed.
- Legal Topics
- Loss of Dependency, Loss of Accumulation of Wealth, Bereavement, Funeral Expenses, Interest, Costs, Assessment of Damages
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Steven Yeung
Plaintiff (administrator/claimant Under Fatal Accidents Ordinance and Larco)
Defendant (unnamed)
Defendant
Lam Fan
Deceased
Procedural Posture
Civil Fatal Accidents and Surviving Cause of Action Under LARCO / Assessment of Damages After Interlocutory Judgment on Liability
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether dependants are entitled to quantified loss of dependency and in what amounts
- 2 Whether the estate is entitled to loss of accumulation of wealth under s.20(2)(b)(iii) of LARCO and how to quantify it
- 3 Whether bereavement damages may be received by the murderer spouse and, if not, whether children succeed to that entitlement
Ratio Decidendi
Court accepted plaintiff's quantifications largely as reasonable, adopted an averaging method starting in 1987 to calculate annual accumulation, found the Deceased would have accumulated further wealth to notional retirement, applied no discount for accelerated receipt because defendant's incarceration made payment before retirement unrealizable, awarded specified sums to Steven and Lily for pre‑ and post‑trial dependency and awarded loss of accumulation to the estate, allowed funeral and cinerary expenses, refused to make a bereavement award to survivors because statute prescribes entitlement and the court would not rewrite statutory priority despite public policy concerns, and ordered...
Court Disposition
Judgment for plaintiff. Damages assessed and awarded to Steven, Lily and the Estate totalling HKD 35,127,845.28 plus interest; funeral and cinerary expenses allowed; bereavement claim not awarded to survivors; costs order nisi made against defendant (certificate for two counsel) to be taxed if not agreed.
Orders
- Award to Steven: pre-trial loss of dependency HKD 3,474,750.00
- Award to Steven: post-trial loss of dependency HKD 540,512.58
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment