LIU LOI KIU AND ANOTHER v. MAK WAI TONG AND OTHERS
Court accepted plaintiffs' dependency calculation of $1,300 per month, applied a multiplier of 14 to annual dependency to arrive at general damages of $218,400, merged an $8,000 statutory lump sum under the Law Amendment and Reform (Consolidation) Ordinance with the Fatal Accidents award, apportioned the general damages among widow and children as specified, awarded special damages of $1,950 with interest, and ordered interest on general damages for the specified period and costs to the plaintiffs.
- Citation
- LIU LOI KIU AND ANOTHER v. MAK WAI TONG AND OTHERS
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: LIU LOI KIU (Widow); 2nd Plaintiff: LIU CHI WAH (Administrators of the Estate of Chan Choi, Deceased); 1st Defendant: MAK WAI TONG; 2nd Defendant: KWONG YUN CHUNG; 3rd Defendant: KOWLOON MOTOR BUS CO. LTD.; 4th Defendant: LEE OI LOI
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 12 November 1976
- Case Number
- HCMP1905/1975
- Procedural Posture
- Fatal Accidents Claim (assessment of Damages) / Assessment of Damages Following Interlocutory Judgment
- Outcome
- Assessment allowed; damages and costs awarded to plaintiffs and apportioned as ordered.
- Legal Topics
- Dependency Calculation, Multiplier for Future Pecuniary Loss, Special Damages, Interest on Damages, Apportionment
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
LIU LOI KIU (Widow)
1st Plaintiff
LIU CHI WAH (Administrators of the Estate of Chan Choi, Deceased)
2nd Plaintiff
MAK WAI TONG
1st Defendant
KWONG YUN CHUNG
2nd Defendant
KOWLOON MOTOR BUS CO. LTD.
3rd Defendant
LEE OI LOI
4th Defendant
Procedural Posture
Fatal Accidents Claim (assessment of Damages) / Assessment of Damages Following Interlocutory Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the proper measure of dependency and monthly dependency amount to be used?
- 2 What multiplier is appropriate for future pecuniary loss given the deceased's age, occupation and family circumstances?
- 3 How should general damages be apportioned between widow and children?
Ratio Decidendi
Court accepted plaintiffs' dependency calculation of $1,300 per month, applied a multiplier of 14 to annual dependency to arrive at general damages of $218,400, merged an $8,000 statutory lump sum under the Law Amendment and Reform (Consolidation) Ordinance with the Fatal Accidents award, apportioned the general damages among widow and children as specified, awarded special damages of $1,950 with interest, and ordered interest on general damages for the specified period and costs to the plaintiffs.
Court Disposition
Assessment allowed; damages and costs awarded to plaintiffs and apportioned as ordered.
Orders
- Damages under the Law Amendment and Reform (Consolidation) Ordinance in the sum of $8,000 assessed and merged with damages under the Fatal Accidents Ordinance.
- General damages assessed at $218,400 (calculated as $1,300 x 12 x 14).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment