SUPREMACY TRADING CO LTD v. ASIAN PROPERTY INVESTMENTS LTD AND ANOTHER

SUPREMACY TRADING CO LTD v. ASIAN PROPERTY INVESTMENTS LTD AND ANOTHER

The court granted leave to appeal in both applications because the applicant demonstrated arguable grounds involving questions of law (acceptance of the tenancy agreement and mitigation issues); accordingly leave to appeal was given and costs were reserved.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
SUPREMACY TRADING CO LTD v. ASIAN PROPERTY INVESTMENTS LTD AND ANOTHER
Parties
Claimant: Supremacy Trading Company Limited; 1st Defendant: Asian Property Investments Ltd; 2nd Defendant: Pearl Dragon Investments Limited
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
3 December 2014
Case Number
HCSA56/2014
Procedural Posture
Small Claims Tribunal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal (decision on Leave)
Outcome
Leave to appeal granted in both appeals (HCSA 56/2014 and HCSA 57/2014); costs reserved; permission to amend application forms granted
Legal Topics
Deposit Refund, Acceptance of Tenancy Agreement, Mitigation of Damages, Leave to Appeal on Question of Law
Source Language
en
Contract Landlord and Tenant Civil Procedure Deposit Refund Acceptance of Tenancy Agreement Mitigation of Damages Leave to Appeal on Question of Law

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Supremacy Trading Company Limited

Claimant

Asian Property Investments Ltd

1st Defendant

Pearl Dragon Investments Limited

2nd Defendant

Procedural Posture

Small Claims Tribunal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal (decision on Leave)

  1. 1 Whether the presiding officer erred in law by failing to consider acceptance of the new tenancy agreement
  2. 2 Whether the defendant failed to mitigate loss (duty to mitigate)
  3. 3 Whether the applicant has an arguable question of law to justify leave to appeal

Ratio Decidendi

The court granted leave to appeal in both applications because the applicant demonstrated arguable grounds involving questions of law (acceptance of the tenancy agreement and mitigation issues); accordingly leave to appeal was given and costs were reserved.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal granted in both appeals (HCSA 56/2014 and HCSA 57/2014); costs reserved; permission to amend application forms granted

Orders

  • Costs reserved