SUPREMACY TRADING CO LTD v. ASIAN PROPERTY INVESTMENTS LTD AND ANOTHER
The court granted leave to appeal in both applications because the applicant demonstrated arguable grounds involving questions of law (acceptance of the tenancy agreement and mitigation issues); accordingly leave to appeal was given and costs were reserved.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- SUPREMACY TRADING CO LTD v. ASIAN PROPERTY INVESTMENTS LTD AND ANOTHER
- Parties
- Claimant: Supremacy Trading Company Limited; 1st Defendant: Asian Property Investments Ltd; 2nd Defendant: Pearl Dragon Investments Limited
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 3 December 2014
- Case Number
- HCSA56/2014
- Procedural Posture
- Small Claims Tribunal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal (decision on Leave)
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted in both appeals (HCSA 56/2014 and HCSA 57/2014); costs reserved; permission to amend application forms granted
- Legal Topics
- Deposit Refund, Acceptance of Tenancy Agreement, Mitigation of Damages, Leave to Appeal on Question of Law
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Supremacy Trading Company Limited
Claimant
Asian Property Investments Ltd
1st Defendant
Pearl Dragon Investments Limited
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Small Claims Tribunal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal (decision on Leave)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the presiding officer erred in law by failing to consider acceptance of the new tenancy agreement
- 2 Whether the defendant failed to mitigate loss (duty to mitigate)
- 3 Whether the applicant has an arguable question of law to justify leave to appeal
Ratio Decidendi
The court granted leave to appeal in both applications because the applicant demonstrated arguable grounds involving questions of law (acceptance of the tenancy agreement and mitigation issues); accordingly leave to appeal was given and costs were reserved.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted in both appeals (HCSA 56/2014 and HCSA 57/2014); costs reserved; permission to amend application forms granted
Orders
- Costs reserved
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
bjbj HCSA 56 & 57/2014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE SMALL CLAIMS TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO 56 OF 2014 (ON APPEAL FROM SMALL CLAIMS TRIBUNAL CLAIM NO 16911 OF 2014) ____________ BETWEEN SUPREMACY TRADING COMPANY LIMITED Claimant and ASIAN PROPERTY INVESTMENTS LTD 1st Defendant PEARL DRAGON INVESTMENTS LIMITED 2nd Defendant ____________ AND IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE SMALL CLAIMS TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO 57 OF 2014 (ON APPEAL FROM SMALL CLAIMS TRIBUNAL CLAIM NO 22437 OF 2014) ____________ BETWEEN SUPREMACY TRADING COMPANY LIMITED Claimant and PEARL DRAGON INVESTMENTS LIMITED Defendant ____________ Before: Hon Au-Yeung J in Chambers Date of Hearing: 3 December 2014 Date of Decision: 3 December 2014 _____________ D E C I S I O N _____________ The defendants were landlord of two adjacent properties. The claimant was the tenant. The claimant sues for refund of the deposit on termination of the tenancy at a time when the new tenancy agreement was not yet delivered to her. The defendant counterclaims for damages being loss of rental for the uncompleted rental period. The claimant now seeks leave to appeal on the grounds set out in the application form. They are effectively similar for both applications for leave to appeal. In substance, the claimant s complaint is that the learned Presiding Officer erred in law in failing to consider or adequately consider the question of acceptance of the new tenancy agreement and the failure of the defendant to mitigate the loss. I shall not repeat the grounds set out in her application. I bear in mind that in seeking leave to appeal, the applicant has to satisfy the court that she is appealing on the ground involving a question of law. The onus is on her to show that the intended appeal has arguable grounds. Having considered the submission of counsel and the draft grounds of appeal, I am satisfied that there are arguable grounds shown and I give leave in respect of both applications. (Discussion between Court and Counsel) I will just put down a note here that I give you leave to amend those two application forms to reflect the date of 5 November. Amended to 5 November to replace 4 November. (Discussion between Court and Counsel) Costs reserved. (Queeny Au-Yeung) Judge of the Court of First Instance High Court Mr T Chow, instructed by C L Chow & Macksion Chan, for the claimants PAGE - A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V pgpg ^VJV hu-Z hu-Z hu-Z hu-Z hu-Z hu-Z hu-Z hu-Z hu-Z gdL} gdL} gdu-Z gdL} gdu-Z wh\P hu-Z hu-Z hu-Z hu-Z hu-Z gdL} hu-Z hu-Z hu-Z }vmvmaG hu-Z VRKF {f_SKS [Content_Types].xml Iw}, $yi} _rels/.rels theme/theme/themeManager.xml K Y, sQ}# theme/theme/theme1.xml w toc'v )I`n 3Vq%'#q x}r :\TZaG I u3 L+M2 e\O* $*c? )6-r IqbJ#x ,AGm T[XF64 E)`# R>QD =(K& =al- 4vfa 0%M0 theme/theme/_rels/themeManager.xml.rels 5 6?$Q K(M&$R(.1 [Content_Types].xmlPK _rels/.relsPK theme/theme/themeManager.xmlPK theme/theme/theme1.xmlPK theme/theme/_rels/themeManager.xml.relsPK <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?> <a:clrMap xmlns:a="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/main" bg1="lt1" tx1="dk1" bg2="lt2" tx2="dk2" accent1="accent1" accent2="accent2" accent3="accent3" accent4="accent4" accent5="accent5" accent6="accent6" hlink="hlink" folHlink="folHlink"/> i$&V >JNZJ j1Gvj1G HCAP 8/2007 Judiciary Normal.dotm pochu Choichan Microsoft Office Word Judiciary Hong Kong HCAP 8/2007 Title <b:Sources SelectedStyle="\APA.XSL" StyleName="APA" xmlns:b="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography" xmlns="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography"></b:Sources> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?> <ds:datastoreItem ds:itemID="{9C6BD63B-ADE5-43B0-B15E-1CC7F1350E83}" xmlns:ds="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/customXml"><ds:schemaRefs><ds:schemaRef ds:uri="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography"/></ds:schemaRefs></ds:datastoreItem> Microsoft Office Word 97-2003 Document MSWordDoc Word.Document.8