JINLIN SUN & ANOTHER v. KENNETH CHI SHING CHEUNG & OTHERS

JINLIN SUN & ANOTHER v. KENNETH CHI SHING CHEUNG & OTHERS

Appointment of an interim receiver was refused because plaintiffs failed to show any present risk to the company's assets or impending transactions that would be prevented only by receivership; damages are an adequate remedy; Styland has set up an investigatory committee and will not proceed to ratify contested transactions pending its report; and the balance of convenience and risk of irreparable harm to the company and third parties favoured refusal of the interlocutory receivership.

Citation
JINLIN SUN & ANOTHER v. KENNETH CHI SHING CHEUNG & OTHERS
Parties
1st Plaintiff: JINLIN SUN; 2nd Plaintiff: WEN LIN; 1st Defendant: KENNETH CHI SHING CHEUNG; 2nd Defendant: YVONNE HAN-YI YEUNG; 3rd Defendant: STEVEN WANG-TAI LI; 4th Defendant: MIRANDA CHI-MEI CHAN; 5th Defendant: KERRY ZHI-KE WANG; 6th Defendant: ANGELINA SWEE-YAN GOH; 7th Defendant: HENRY BING KWONG CHAN; 8th Defendant: SUET-MING CHING; 9th Defendant: ERIK YUK-WO CHENG; 10th Defendant: JOHNNY WING FAI TAM; 11th Defendant: DAVID MAN-SAN LIM; 12th Defendant: EDWARD SHUN KEE YEUNG; 13th Defendant: STYLAND HOLDINGS LIMITED
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
13 October 2003
Case Number
HCA3544/2003
Procedural Posture
Derivative Action With Interlocutory Application for Appointment of Interim Receivers / Interlocutory Judgment on Summons for Interim Receivership (application Dismissed)
Outcome
Summons dismissed
Legal Topics
Derivative Action, Interim Receivership, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Disclosure Obligations, Listing Rules Compliance
Source Language
EN
Company Law Equity and Trusts Corporate Governance Civil Procedure Securities Regulation Derivative Action Interim Receivership Breach of Fiduciary Duty +2 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 9
Sign in to unlock

Parties

JINLIN SUN

1st Plaintiff

WEN LIN

2nd Plaintiff

KENNETH CHI SHING CHEUNG

1st Defendant

YVONNE HAN-YI YEUNG

2nd Defendant

STEVEN WANG-TAI LI

3rd Defendant

MIRANDA CHI-MEI CHAN

4th Defendant

KERRY ZHI-KE WANG

5th Defendant

ANGELINA SWEE-YAN GOH

6th Defendant

HENRY BING KWONG CHAN

7th Defendant

SUET-MING CHING

8th Defendant

ERIK YUK-WO CHENG

9th Defendant

JOHNNY WING FAI TAM

10th Defendant

DAVID MAN-SAN LIM

11th Defendant

EDWARD SHUN KEE YEUNG

12th Defendant

STYLAND HOLDINGS LIMITED

13th Defendant

Procedural Posture

Derivative Action With Interlocutory Application for Appointment of Interim Receivers / Interlocutory Judgment on Summons for Interim Receivership (application Dismissed)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether an interim receiver should be appointed under HCO s.21L with powers to manage Styland pending trial
  2. 2 Whether Styland's directors breached fiduciary duties by failing to make full and frank disclosure under HKEX Listing Rules
  3. 3 Whether damages would be adequate remedy and balance of convenience favours appointment of a receiver

Ratio Decidendi

Appointment of an interim receiver was refused because plaintiffs failed to show any present risk to the company's assets or impending transactions that would be prevented only by receivership; damages are an adequate remedy; Styland has set up an investigatory committee and will not proceed to ratify contested transactions pending its report; and the balance of convenience and risk of irreparable harm to the company and third parties favoured refusal of the interlocutory receivership.

Court Disposition

Summons dismissed

Orders

  • Summons for appointment of interim receivers dismissed
  • Parties to be heard on costs and other consequential orders