LEE LEUNG NANG STEWART AND OTHERS v. LI CHUNG SHING TONG (HOLDINGS) LTD
The court granted leave under s168BC because plaintiffs had served notice, established prima facie that proceedings were in the company's interest and disclosed serious questions to be tried given evidence of contamination and outsourcing failures implicating senior management and a director; the application to appoint an independent professional accountant under s168BG was refused because existing investigations and available material were, on the facts, sufficient and appointment was not necessary; plaintiffs' costs of the leave application were ordered to be paid by the company while indemnification for future litigation costs was adjourned sine die pending further financial information.
- Citation
- LEE LEUNG NANG STEWART AND OTHERS v. LI CHUNG SHING TONG (HOLDINGS) LTD
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: Lee Leung Nang Stewart; 2nd Plaintiff: Lee Cheung Nang Alfred; 3rd Plaintiff: Li Tai Sang Albert; Defendant/company: Li Chung Shing Tong (Holdings) Limited
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 5 September 2011
- Case Number
- HCMP1516/2010
- Procedural Posture
- Statutory Derivative Action Under Section 168 BC Companies Ordinance (cap.32) / Application for Leave by Originating Summons (leave Granted)
- Outcome
- Leave granted to Plaintiffs to bring statutory derivative proceedings on behalf of the Company under s168BC; application to appoint an independent professional accountant under s168BG refused; Plaintiffs' costs of this leave application awarded against the Company; application for indemnity of future costs adjourned...
- Legal Topics
- Derivative Action, Leave to Bring Proceedings, Breach of Directors' Duties, Appointment of Independent Investigator, Costs and Indemnity
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lee Leung Nang Stewart
1st Plaintiff
Lee Cheung Nang Alfred
2nd Plaintiff
Li Tai Sang Albert
3rd Plaintiff
Li Chung Shing Tong (Holdings) Limited
Defendant/company
Procedural Posture
Statutory Derivative Action Under Section 168 BC Companies Ordinance (cap.32) / Application for Leave by Originating Summons (leave Granted)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiffs satisfied requirements of s168BC(3) for leave (prima facie in company's interest; serious question to be tried; notice served)
- 2 Whether an independent professional accountant should be appointed under s168BG
- 3 Whether costs of the application and future proceedings should be paid/indemnified by the company under s168BI
Ratio Decidendi
The court granted leave under s168BC because plaintiffs had served notice, established prima facie that proceedings were in the company's interest and disclosed serious questions to be tried given evidence of contamination and outsourcing failures implicating senior management and a director; the application to appoint an independent professional accountant under s168BG was refused because existing investigations and available material were, on the facts, sufficient and appointment was not necessary; plaintiffs' costs of the leave application were ordered to be paid by the company while indemnification for future litigation costs was adjourned sine die pending further financial information.
Court Disposition
Leave granted to Plaintiffs to bring statutory derivative proceedings on behalf of the Company under s168BC; application to appoint an independent professional accountant under s168BG refused; Plaintiffs' costs of this leave application awarded against the Company; application for indemnity of future costs adjourned...
Orders
- Leave granted to the Plaintiffs to bring proceedings on behalf of Li Chung Shing Tong (Holdings) Limited under section 168BC of the Companies Ordinance
- Order refusing appointment of an independent professional accountant under section 168BG
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment