SECURITIES AND FUTURES COMMISSION v. YEUNG KUI WONG AND OTHERS
On the agreed facts the court was satisfied that, during the relevant period, the business or affairs of the Company were conducted in a manner involving misfeasance or misconduct and/or resulting in members not being given information they might reasonably expect within s.214(1)(b) and (c). The 3rd and 4th Respondents failed persistently to ensure compliance with Listing Rules including non-disclosure of multiple price-sensitive events and connected-party financial assistance; accordingly disqualification under s.214(2)(d) was appropriate and, taking into account guidance on tariff brackets and mitigation, a 5-year disqualification was imposed.
- Citation
- SECURITIES AND FUTURES COMMISSION v. YEUNG KUI WONG AND OTHERS
- Parties
- Petitioner: Securities and Futures Commission; 1st Respondent: Yeung Kui Wong; 2nd Respondent: Hung Kwok Wa Godfrey; 3rd Respondent: Lai Wing Chuen John; 4th Respondent: Yeung Ying Fong Ellen; 5th Respondent: Yu Hung Wong; 6th Respondent: Leung Ping Chung Hermann
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 9 April 2010
- Case Number
- HCMP1742/2009
- Procedural Posture
- Disqualification Proceedings Under Section 214 Securities and Futures Ordinance / Judgment (carecraft Summary Procedure)
- Outcome
- Disqualification orders made against the 3rd and 4th Respondents; each disqualified for 5 years starting 21 days from the date of the order and each ordered to pay HK$90,000 to the SFC for costs.
- Legal Topics
- Director Disqualification, Failure to Disclose Price Sensitive Information, Breach of Listing Rules, Misfeasance, Carecraft Summary Disposal
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Securities and Futures Commission
Petitioner
Yeung Kui Wong
1st Respondent
Hung Kwok Wa Godfrey
2nd Respondent
Lai Wing Chuen John
3rd Respondent
Yeung Ying Fong Ellen
4th Respondent
Yu Hung Wong
5th Respondent
Leung Ping Chung Hermann
6th Respondent
Procedural Posture
Disqualification Proceedings Under Section 214 Securities and Futures Ordinance / Judgment (carecraft Summary Procedure)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the directors' conduct amounted to misfeasance or misconduct and/or resulted in shareholders not being given information they might reasonably expect within s.214(1)(b) and (c) of the SFO
- 2 Whether persistent failure to disclose a series of price-sensitive events and connected-party financial assistance breached Listing Rules and warranted disqualification
- 3 What is the appropriate length and scope of disqualification given established brackets and mitigating factors
Ratio Decidendi
On the agreed facts the court was satisfied that, during the relevant period, the business or affairs of the Company were conducted in a manner involving misfeasance or misconduct and/or resulting in members not being given information they might reasonably expect within s.214(1)(b) and (c). The 3rd and 4th Respondents failed persistently to ensure compliance with Listing Rules including non-disclosure of multiple price-sensitive events and connected-party financial assistance; accordingly disqualification under s.214(2)(d) was appropriate and, taking into account guidance on tariff brackets and mitigation, a 5-year disqualification was imposed.
Court Disposition
Disqualification orders made against the 3rd and 4th Respondents; each disqualified for 5 years starting 21 days from the date of the order and each ordered to pay HK$90,000 to the SFC for costs.
Orders
- The 3rd and 4th Respondents are disqualified for a period of 5 years commencing 21 days from the date of this order and, without leave of the court, shall not during that period be or continue to be a director, liquidator, receiver or manager of the property or business of any listed or unlisted company in Hong Kong...
- The 3rd and 4th Respondents shall each pay HK$90,000 to the Securities and Futures Commission in respect of the SFC's costs of these proceedings
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment