SECURITIES AND FUTURES COMMISSION v. YEUNG KUI WONG AND OTHERS
On the agreed facts the court was satisfied that during the relevant period the business and affairs of Warderly were conducted in a manner involving misfeasance or misconduct and in a manner that denied members and the public price-sensitive information; the conduct breached the Listing Rules and warranted disqualification under s.214(2)(d) of the SFO. The court imposed a five-year disqualification on the 1st respondent and a two-year disqualification on the 5th respondent and ordered specified contributions to the SFC\'s costs, with a narrow exemption for a named private company for the 1st respondent.
- Citation
- SECURITIES AND FUTURES COMMISSION v. YEUNG KUI WONG AND OTHERS
- Parties
- Petitioner: Securities and Futures Commission; 1st Respondent: Yeung Kui Wong; 2nd Respondent: Hung Kwok Wa Godfrey; 3rd Respondent: Lai Wing Chuen John; 4th Respondent: Yeung Ying Fong Ellen; 5th Respondent: Yu Hung Wong; 6th Respondent: Leung Ping Chung Hermann
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 27 October 2010
- Case Number
- HCMP1742/2009
- Procedural Posture
- Section 214 SFO Disqualification Proceedings / Final Judgment (reasons for Decision) Following Summary Carecraft Procedure
- Outcome
- Disqualification orders made under s.214 SFO against the 1st and 5th respondents as set out below
- Legal Topics
- Director Disqualification, Disclosure Obligations (price Sensitive Information), Misfeasance and Misconduct, Connected Transactions and Pledging of Shares, Costs
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Securities and Futures Commission
Petitioner
Yeung Kui Wong
1st Respondent
Hung Kwok Wa Godfrey
2nd Respondent
Lai Wing Chuen John
3rd Respondent
Yeung Ying Fong Ellen
4th Respondent
Yu Hung Wong
5th Respondent
Leung Ping Chung Hermann
6th Respondent
Procedural Posture
Section 214 SFO Disqualification Proceedings / Final Judgment (reasons for Decision) Following Summary Carecraft Procedure
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the directors conducted the company's affairs involving misfeasance or misconduct under s.214(1)(b) of the SFO
- 2 Whether members and the market were deprived of price-sensitive information contrary to s.214(1)(c) and the Listing Rules
- 3 Appropriate scope and duration of disqualification orders and costs contributions
Ratio Decidendi
On the agreed facts the court was satisfied that during the relevant period the business and affairs of Warderly were conducted in a manner involving misfeasance or misconduct and in a manner that denied members and the public price-sensitive information; the conduct breached the Listing Rules and warranted disqualification under s.214(2)(d) of the SFO. The court imposed a five-year disqualification on the 1st respondent and a two-year disqualification on the 5th respondent and ordered specified contributions to the SFC\'s costs, with a narrow exemption for a named private company for the 1st respondent.
Court Disposition
Disqualification orders made under s.214 SFO against the 1st and 5th respondents as set out below
Orders
- 1st Respondent (Yeung Kui Wong) disqualified for 5 years from being or acting as director, liquidator, receiver or manager of any listed or unlisted Hong Kong company or from being concerned in management of any such company without leave of the Court (narrow exemption for Homely Manufacturing Limited); order...
- 5th Respondent (Yu Hung Wong) disqualified for 2 years from being or acting as director, liquidator, receiver or manager of any listed or unlisted Hong Kong company or from being concerned in management of any such company without leave of the Court
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment