SECURITIES AND FUTURES COMMISSION v. YIN YINGNENG RICHARD AND OTHERS
The respondents were found to have acted dishonestly and breached fiduciary duties by fabricating a non-existent MUA and causing wrongful payment of company assets; disqualification under s214(2)(d) SFO is appropriate, and after weighing gravity, relative culpability, mitigation (including repayment), personal circumstances and lack of credit for late remorse, the court imposed disqualifications of 7 years on Wang, 5 years on Lee and 4 years on Yin and refused any exception permitting Wang to work indirectly in contravention of the disqualification.
- Citation
- SECURITIES AND FUTURES COMMISSION v. YIN YINGNENG RICHARD AND OTHERS
- Parties
- Petitioner: Securities and Futures Commission; 1st Respondent: Yin Yingneng Richard; 2nd Respondent: Lee Yiu Sun; 3rd Respondent: Wang Wen Ming; 4th Respondent: First China Financial Network Holdings Limited
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 30 September 2015
- Case Number
- HCMP2502/2012
- Procedural Posture
- Disqualification Proceeding Under Section 214 of the Securities and Futures Ordinance / Post Judgment Disqualification Hearing and Decision
- Outcome
- Disqualification orders made against the respondents pursuant to s214(2)(d) SFO: Wang disqualified for 7 years, Lee for 5 years, Yin for 4 years; exception request to permit Wang to work in a mainland company rejected.
- Legal Topics
- Director Disqualification, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Dishonesty, Remedies Under SFO S214, Mitigation and Sentencing Principles
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Securities and Futures Commission
Petitioner
Yin Yingneng Richard
1st Respondent
Lee Yiu Sun
2nd Respondent
Wang Wen Ming
3rd Respondent
First China Financial Network Holdings Limited
4th Respondent
Procedural Posture
Disqualification Proceeding Under Section 214 of the Securities and Futures Ordinance / Post Judgment Disqualification Hearing and Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether respondents should be disqualified under s214(2)(d) SFO
- 2 Appropriate length of disqualification for each respondent
- 3 Assessment of relative culpability and mitigation
Ratio Decidendi
The respondents were found to have acted dishonestly and breached fiduciary duties by fabricating a non-existent MUA and causing wrongful payment of company assets; disqualification under s214(2)(d) SFO is appropriate, and after weighing gravity, relative culpability, mitigation (including repayment), personal circumstances and lack of credit for late remorse, the court imposed disqualifications of 7 years on Wang, 5 years on Lee and 4 years on Yin and refused any exception permitting Wang to work indirectly in contravention of the disqualification.
Court Disposition
Disqualification orders made against the respondents pursuant to s214(2)(d) SFO: Wang disqualified for 7 years, Lee for 5 years, Yin for 4 years; exception request to permit Wang to work in a mainland company rejected.
Orders
- Wang Wen Ming is disqualified from being a director or being concerned in the management of a company incorporated in Hong Kong for 7 years pursuant to s214(2)(d) SFO
- Lee Yiu Sun is disqualified from being a director or being concerned in the management of a company incorporated in Hong Kong for 5 years pursuant to s214(2)(d) SFO
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment