SECURITIES AND FUTURES COMMISSION v. KWOK WING AND OTHERS
On the admitted factual matrix the 4th respondent demonstrably failed to exercise independent judgment, was lacking in diligence and competence, permitted nondisclosure of price‑sensitive information and participated in misleading announcements; that conduct falls within s214(1)(b) and (c) of the SFO and justifies a disqualification order under s214(2)(d) for six years, with costs payable to the Commission.
- Citation
- SECURITIES AND FUTURES COMMISSION v. KWOK WING AND OTHERS
- Parties
- Petitioner: Securities and Futures Commission; 1st Respondent: Kwok Wing; 2nd Respondent: Kwok Choi Ha, Michelle; 3rd Respondent: Ho Yik Kin, Norman; 4th Respondent: Lam Yick Sing; 5th Respondent / Company: Tack Fat Group International Limited (renamed Tack Fiori International Group Limited); 6th Respondent: Key Winner Holdings Limited
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 27 March 2015
- Case Number
- HCMP3392/2013
- Procedural Posture
- Proceedings Under Section 214 of the Securities and Futures Ordinance Seeking Director Disqualification / Summary Carecraft Procedure; Decision on Petition and Making of Disqualification Order
- Outcome
- Disqualification order made against the 4th respondent under section 214(2)(d) of the Securities and Futures Ordinance for six years; costs awarded to the Petitioner in the agreed amount; schedule to be annexed to judgment
- Legal Topics
- Director Disqualification, Misfeasance, Failure to Disclose Price‑sensitive Information, Connected Transactions, Breach of Listing Rules
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Securities and Futures Commission
Petitioner
Kwok Wing
1st Respondent
Kwok Choi Ha, Michelle
2nd Respondent
Ho Yik Kin, Norman
3rd Respondent
Lam Yick Sing
4th Respondent
Tack Fat Group International Limited (renamed Tack Fiori International Group Limited)
5th Respondent / Company
Key Winner Holdings Limited
6th Respondent
Procedural Posture
Proceedings Under Section 214 of the Securities and Futures Ordinance Seeking Director Disqualification / Summary Carecraft Procedure; Decision on Petition and Making of Disqualification Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the 4th respondent's conduct fell within section 214(1)(b) and (c) of the SFO
- 2 Whether the 4th respondent breached Listing Rules obligations to disclose price‑sensitive information and made false or misleading announcements
- 3 Whether a disqualification order under s214(2)(d) is appropriate and for what period
Ratio Decidendi
On the admitted factual matrix the 4th respondent demonstrably failed to exercise independent judgment, was lacking in diligence and competence, permitted nondisclosure of price‑sensitive information and participated in misleading announcements; that conduct falls within s214(1)(b) and (c) of the SFO and justifies a disqualification order under s214(2)(d) for six years, with costs payable to the Commission.
Court Disposition
Disqualification order made against the 4th respondent under section 214(2)(d) of the Securities and Futures Ordinance for six years; costs awarded to the Petitioner in the agreed amount; schedule to be annexed to judgment
Orders
- Disqualify Lam Yick Sing from being or acting as a director, liquidator, receiver or manager of any listed or unlisted company in Hong Kong and from being concerned in management of any such company for a period of 6 years from the date of the order without the leave of the Court
- Lam Yick Sing to pay the Securities and Futures Commission's costs in the sum agreed between the parties
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment