SECURITIES AND FUTURES COMMISSION v. LAM WO PING AND OTHERS
On the agreed facts the company’s affairs were conducted in a manner engaging s.214(1)(b),(c) and (d); the 4th respondent as CFO breached duties of care, skill and diligence by failing to verify and disclose extensive deposit pledges, but having regard to his limited role, cooperation, admission of liability, mitigating factors and personal circumstances the appropriate and proportionate remedy was a 2‑year disqualification confined as agreed together with a costs order of HK$500,000 payable on or before 6 March 2024.
- Citation
- [2024] HKCFI 315
- Parties
- Petitioner: Securities and Futures Commission; 1st Respondent: Lam Wo Ping; 2nd Respondent: Lam Wo Sze; 3rd Respondent: Lam Wing Ho; 4th Respondent: Chan Wai Shing; 5th Respondent: Fuguiniao Co., Ltd.
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 24 January 2024
- Case Number
- HCMP2328/2019
- Procedural Posture
- S.214 Petition Under the Securities and Futures Ordinance / Carecraft Settlement Summary Disposal Hearing
- Outcome
- Application by SFC for summary disposal by Carecraft procedure in respect of the 4th respondent granted; disqualification order made for 2 years and costs order made
- Legal Topics
- Director Disqualification, Disclosure Obligations, Breach of Directors' Duties, Listing Rules Compliance, Carecraft Settlement
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Securities and Futures Commission
Petitioner
Lam Wo Ping
1st Respondent
Lam Wo Sze
2nd Respondent
Lam Wing Ho
3rd Respondent
Chan Wai Shing
4th Respondent
Fuguiniao Co., Ltd.
5th Respondent
Procedural Posture
S.214 Petition Under the Securities and Futures Ordinance / Carecraft Settlement Summary Disposal Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the business and affairs of the company were conducted in a manner falling within s.214(1)(b),(c) and (d) of the SFO
- 2 Whether the 4th respondent breached duties of care, skill and diligence as CFO and company secretary
- 3 Appropriate length and scope of a disqualification order given the agreed facts and mitigation
Ratio Decidendi
On the agreed facts the company’s affairs were conducted in a manner engaging s.214(1)(b),(c) and (d); the 4th respondent as CFO breached duties of care, skill and diligence by failing to verify and disclose extensive deposit pledges, but having regard to his limited role, cooperation, admission of liability, mitigating factors and personal circumstances the appropriate and proportionate remedy was a 2‑year disqualification confined as agreed together with a costs order of HK$500,000 payable on or before 6 March 2024.
Court Disposition
Application by SFC for summary disposal by Carecraft procedure in respect of the 4th respondent granted; disqualification order made for 2 years and costs order made
Orders
- 4th respondent disqualified for 2 years from being or continuing to be a director, liquidator, receiver or manager of the property or business of the Company or any of its subsidiaries or affiliates or any other corporation in Hong Kong without the leave of the Court
- 4th respondent prohibited for 2 years from directly or indirectly being concerned in the management of the Company or any of its subsidiaries or affiliates or any listed corporation or its subsidiaries or affiliates in Hong Kong without the leave of the Court
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment