LAU WING YAN AND OTHERS v. CHU KONG AND OTHERS
The Variation Summons was dismissed and costs should follow the event; the plaintiffs failed to show that their without‑prejudice letter would have secured the availability of key witnesses or avoided costs and delay, the X‑Exam dismissal was a justified case management direction to resolve the Discharge Summons at...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- LAU WING YAN AND OTHERS v. CHU KONG AND OTHERS
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: LAU WING YAN; 2nd Plaintiff: SUN MIN; 3rd Plaintiff: CHANG DAFA; 4th Plaintiff: PACIFIC BULK SHIPPING (CAYMAN) LIMITED; 1st Defendant: CHU KONG; 2nd Defendant: LU ZHONG ZHI; 3rd Defendant: HU MU ZHONG; 4th Defendant: JOINT SILVER LIMITED; 5th Defendant: CENTRAL SHIPPING COMPANY LIMITED
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 28 April 2017
- Case Number
- HCA2562/2014
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Injunction Discharge and Related Summonses / Post Hearing Variation Summons (costs) Disposed on Paper by Deputy Judge
- Outcome
- Variation Summons dismissed; costs follow the event; plaintiffs ordered to pay Mr Chu's costs of the Variation Summons forthwith, to be taxed if not agreed.
- Legal Topics
- Discharge of Injunction, Pre Trial Cross Examination, Variation of Costs Order, Case Management Directions
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
LAU WING YAN
1st Plaintiff
SUN MIN
2nd Plaintiff
CHANG DAFA
3rd Plaintiff
PACIFIC BULK SHIPPING (CAYMAN) LIMITED
4th Plaintiff
CHU KONG
1st Defendant
LU ZHONG ZHI
2nd Defendant
HU MU ZHONG
3rd Defendant
JOINT SILVER LIMITED
4th Defendant
CENTRAL SHIPPING COMPANY LIMITED
5th Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Injunction Discharge and Related Summonses / Post Hearing Variation Summons (costs) Disposed on Paper by Deputy Judge
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the costs order nisi should be varied to require Mr Chu to pay the costs of the X‑Exam Summons forthwith with certificate for two counsel
- 2 Whether pre-trial cross-examination of the plaintiffs' deponents should be ordered or the Discharge Summons adjourned to trial
- 3 Whether the plaintiffs' without‑prejudice letter amounted to a settlement/configuration that would justify varying costs
Ratio Decidendi
The Variation Summons was dismissed and costs should follow the event; the plaintiffs failed to show that their without‑prejudice letter would have secured the availability of key witnesses or avoided costs and delay, the X‑Exam dismissal was a justified case management direction to resolve the Discharge Summons at trial with cross‑examination, and therefore the court declined to vary the costs order nisi and ordered the plaintiffs to pay Mr Chu's costs of the Variation Summons forthwith, to be taxed if not agreed.
Court Disposition
Variation Summons dismissed; costs follow the event; plaintiffs ordered to pay Mr Chu's costs of the Variation Summons forthwith, to be taxed if not agreed.
Orders
- Variation Summons dismissed
- Costs follow the event
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment