RE HONG KONG ORIENT SHIPPING CO LTD SA
The High Court allowed the judicial review: the Coroner erred in ordering disclosure of crew statements because the statements were the property of the Marine Department and disclosure would constitute a breach of trust; the Coroner failed to have proper regard to Section 60(2) of the Shipping and Port Control Ordinance and to the public interest in preserving confidentiality which could impair future Marine Department investigations; therefore disclosure to all interested parties was unlawful and the Coroner's order was set aside.
- Citation
- RE HONG KONG ORIENT SHIPPING CO LTD SA
- Parties
- Applicant (owners of Vessel 'sunshine Island'): Hong Kong Orient Shipping Company Limited S.A.; Applicants (master and Crew): Chen Ping Tsoo and others; Respondent (coroner): J.W. Hansen (Her Majesty's Coroner); Interested Party / Respondent: Marine Department / Director of Marine; Interested Party (sought Disclosure): Green Island Cement Company Limited; Interested Party: Pioneer Cement (H.K.) Ltd
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 31 December 1981
- Case Number
- HCMP1677/1981
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / High Court Judgment on Application for Judicial Review of Coroner's Ruling
- Outcome
- Application for judicial review allowed; Coroner's ruling ordering disclosure of crew statements set aside.
- Legal Topics
- Disclosure of Documents, Privilege and Confidentiality, Statutory Non‑admissibility (s.60(2)), Public Interest Balancing, Locus Standi, Discovery Vs Subpoena
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hong Kong Orient Shipping Company Limited S.A.
Applicant (owners of Vessel 'sunshine Island')
Chen Ping Tsoo and others
Applicants (master and Crew)
J.W. Hansen (Her Majesty's Coroner)
Respondent (coroner)
Marine Department / Director of Marine
Interested Party / Respondent
Green Island Cement Company Limited
Interested Party (sought Disclosure)
Pioneer Cement (H.K.) Ltd
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / High Court Judgment on Application for Judicial Review of Coroner's Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a Coroner may disclose to interested parties copies of statements in the Coroner's possession made to the Marine Department
- 2 Whether the Coroner has power to order discovery of documents or to produce documents which are property of the Marine Department
- 3 Whether statements obtained under Section 60(1)(e) of the Shipping and Port Control Ordinance are admissible or may be disclosed in a Coroner's inquiry in light of Section 60(2)
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court allowed the judicial review: the Coroner erred in ordering disclosure of crew statements because the statements were the property of the Marine Department and disclosure would constitute a breach of trust; the Coroner failed to have proper regard to Section 60(2) of the Shipping and Port Control Ordinance and to the public interest in preserving confidentiality which could impair future Marine Department investigations; therefore disclosure to all interested parties was unlawful and the Coroner's order was set aside.
Court Disposition
Application for judicial review allowed; Coroner's ruling ordering disclosure of crew statements set aside.
Orders
- Coroner's order to disclose statements of members of the crew to interested parties is quashed
- Parties to be heard as to the precise form of the court's order and as to costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment