TANG MAN KIT AND ANOTHER v. HIP HING TIMBER CO. LTD.
The Court held that factual records from related proceedings (including minutes and affirmations) are relevant to determine the factual matrix needed to decide the legal status of the Heung; legal professional privilege can be preserved by redaction, and the implied undertaking may restrict use of documents from other proceedings; accordingly the application for discovery was allowed but limited to the body of affirmations and correspondence, excluding exhibited documents.
- Citation
- TANG MAN KIT AND ANOTHER v. HIP HING TIMBER CO. LTD.
- Parties
- Plaintiff in Present Proceedings: Plaintiff; Defendant in Present Proceedings / Applicant for Specific Discovery: Defendant; Party Referenced (plaintiff/defendant in Related Proceedings): Tang Man Kit; Party Referenced (plaintiff/defendant in Related Proceedings): Chan Kam Cheung; Applicant in Referenced Miscellaneous Proceedings: Tonkit Development Limited; Applicant in Referenced Miscellaneous Proceedings: Wong Kam Tong; Applicant in Referenced Miscellaneous Proceedings: Wong Kwan Wing
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 22 August 2000
- Case Number
- HCA8000/1990
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Discovery Application Involving Trusts and Land Registration Under the New Territories Ordinance / Interlocutory Application for Specific Discovery in the High Court
- Outcome
- Application for specific discovery partly allowed with limitations
- Legal Topics
- Discovery, Legal Professional Privilege, Implied Undertaking, Status of Unincorporated Associations Vs Trust Vs Tong, Registration Under Section 15 New Territories Ordinance, Consent Orders
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Plaintiff
Plaintiff in Present Proceedings
Defendant
Defendant in Present Proceedings / Applicant for Specific Discovery
Tang Man Kit
Party Referenced (plaintiff/defendant in Related Proceedings)
Chan Kam Cheung
Party Referenced (plaintiff/defendant in Related Proceedings)
Tonkit Development Limited
Applicant in Referenced Miscellaneous Proceedings
Wong Kam Tong
Applicant in Referenced Miscellaneous Proceedings
Wong Kwan Wing
Applicant in Referenced Miscellaneous Proceedings
Procedural Posture
Civil Discovery Application Involving Trusts and Land Registration Under the New Territories Ordinance / Interlocutory Application for Specific Discovery in the High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether minutes of a meeting convened under a consent order are relevant for determination of the legal status of the Heung
- 2 Whether affirmations and correspondence from related proceedings are discoverable and the permissible scope of discovery (body vs exhibits)
- 3 Extent to which legal professional privilege or implied undertaking prevents use or disclosure of documents from other proceedings
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held that factual records from related proceedings (including minutes and affirmations) are relevant to determine the factual matrix needed to decide the legal status of the Heung; legal professional privilege can be preserved by redaction, and the implied undertaking may restrict use of documents from other proceedings; accordingly the application for discovery was allowed but limited to the body of affirmations and correspondence, excluding exhibited documents.
Court Disposition
Application for specific discovery partly allowed with limitations
Orders
- Order discovery of the body of the affirmations from the referenced proceedings but not any documents exhibited to those affirmations
- Order discovery of the body of correspondence from the referenced proceedings but not any documents exhibited or annexed to such correspondence
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment