RE LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL ELECTION FOR THE HONG KONG ISLAND (EAST) ELECTORAL COLLEGE CONSTITUENCY
Lay assessors and adjudicators do not hold 'public office' for disqualification purposes because their roles are advisory, voluntary, occasional and lack the indicia of an office of emolument under the Crown with continuance; furthermore, statutory time-bars and validation provisions prevent collateral challenges to District Board elections or votes, so Chan's nomination and election were valid.
- Citation
- RE LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL ELECTION FOR THE HONG KONG ISLAND (EAST) ELECTORAL COLLEGE CONSTITUENCY
- Parties
- Petitioner: Desmond Lee Yue-tai; 1st Respondent: Chan Ying-lun; 2nd Respondent (returning Officer): Fong Chi-wai
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 8 March 1989
- Case Number
- HCMP2226/1988
- Procedural Posture
- Election Petition (legislative Council) / High Court Judgment Delivered
- Outcome
- Petition dismissed; Chan Ying-lun duly elected
- Legal Topics
- Disqualification From Office, Definition of Public Office, Voter Eligibility, Statutory Interpretation, Time Bar and Validation
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Desmond Lee Yue-tai
Petitioner
Chan Ying-lun
1st Respondent
Fong Chi-wai
2nd Respondent (returning Officer)
Procedural Posture
Election Petition (legislative Council) / High Court Judgment Delivered
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a lay assessor or adjudicator constitutes a 'public office' or 'public officer' for disqualification under s21(1)(b) and s19(1)(a)
- 2 Whether votes cast by District Board members alleged to be disqualified (Mrs Lam and Mr Chow) could be impugned in this election petition given statutory time-bars and validation provisions
- 3 Whether the election should be declared void or the petitioner declared elected
Ratio Decidendi
Lay assessors and adjudicators do not hold 'public office' for disqualification purposes because their roles are advisory, voluntary, occasional and lack the indicia of an office of emolument under the Crown with continuance; furthermore, statutory time-bars and validation provisions prevent collateral challenges to District Board elections or votes, so Chan's nomination and election were valid.
Court Disposition
Petition dismissed; Chan Ying-lun duly elected
Orders
- Court certifies that the returning officer's decision as to validity of Chan Ying-lun's nomination was correct
- Court certifies that Chan Ying-lun was duly elected as Member of the Legislative Council for Hong Kong Island (East) on 22 September 1988
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment