YUNG CHONG KEUNG v. LAM CHUN MOU

YUNG CHONG KEUNG v. LAM CHUN MOU

The ex parte injunctions obtained by Yung were discharged for material non-disclosure of correspondence; there was no sufficient evidence of fraud to vitiate Lam's notice of dissolution and no serious question to be tried on that issue; the court will not order specific performance to compel continuation of the partnership; a limited injunction was granted restraining Yung from representing that Lam had retired until trial and the matter was ordered to a speedy trial with specified case management directions.

Citation
YUNG CHONG KEUNG v. LAM CHUN MOU
Parties
Plaintiff in Hca16477/99 and Defendant in Hca16615/99: Yung Chong Keung; Defendant in Hca16477/99 and Plaintiff in Hca16615/99: Lam Chun Mou
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
10 November 1999
Case Number
HCA16477/1999
Procedural Posture
Partnership Dispute and Interlocutory Injunction Applications / Interlocutory Applications to Discharge/continue Injunctions; Consolidated Actions; Order for Speedy Trial
Outcome
Ex parte injunctions obtained by Yung discharged; restrained representation that Lam had retired granted until trial; no injunction restraining dissolution granted; case ordered for speedy trial; costs awarded to Lam (nisi).
Legal Topics
Dissolution of Partnership, Material Non Disclosure in Ex Parte Applications, Allegations of Fraud, Specific Performance of Partnership Agreements, Undertakings, Diversion of Customers, Disclosure and Delivery of Partnership Accounts
Source Language
EN
Partnership Law Injunctions Civil Procedure Equity Contract Law Dissolution of Partnership Material Non Disclosure in Ex Parte Applications Allegations of Fraud +4 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Yung Chong Keung

Plaintiff in Hca16477/99 and Defendant in Hca16615/99

Lam Chun Mou

Defendant in Hca16477/99 and Plaintiff in Hca16615/99

Procedural Posture

Partnership Dispute and Interlocutory Injunction Applications / Interlocutory Applications to Discharge/continue Injunctions; Consolidated Actions; Order for Speedy Trial

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether ex parte injunctions obtained by Yung should be continued or discharged because of material non-disclosure
  2. 2 Whether the notice of dissolution served by Lam was vitiated by fraud
  3. 3 Whether the court should restrain Lam from dissolving the partnership (effectively ordering specific performance of the partnership)

Ratio Decidendi

The ex parte injunctions obtained by Yung were discharged for material non-disclosure of correspondence; there was no sufficient evidence of fraud to vitiate Lam's notice of dissolution and no serious question to be tried on that issue; the court will not order specific performance to compel continuation of the partnership; a limited injunction was granted restraining Yung from representing that Lam had retired until trial and the matter was ordered to a speedy trial with specified case management directions.

Court Disposition

Ex parte injunctions obtained by Yung discharged; restrained representation that Lam had retired granted until trial; no injunction restraining dissolution granted; case ordered for speedy trial; costs awarded to Lam (nisi).

Orders

  • The injunctions obtained by Yung are discharged.
  • Upon Lam's undertaking no order is made on Yung's application to restrain disclosure; Lam given liberty to apply concerning his undertaking.