LIN GUIFEI, as the administratrix of the estate of LEE KIN WAH, Deceased v. LUI CHUNG since Deceased, LUI PO KIN RICKY, appointed by an Order dated 28th March 2025 to represent the Estate of LUI CHUNG, Deceased AND ANOTHER
The court found the Last Partnership was dissolved on the Deceased's death; the Post-2017 Luen Fat carried on the business of the firm and at least some partnership assets (including unaccounted cash and unreconciled entitlements beyond the HK$312,696.20 cashier order) were utilised by the Defendants; the Defendants failed to discharge the burden of proving non-use of partnership assets; all statutory conditions in s44 were satisfied; therefore the Plaintiff is entitled to relief under s44 and the court ordered taking of partnership account, inquiries and tracing and found misappropriation of the Deceased's entitlements beyond the cashier order.
- Citation
- [2025] HKCFI 1904
- Parties
- Plaintiff (administratrix of the Estate of Lee Kin Wah, Deceased): Lin Guifei; 1st Defendant (deceased; Estate Represented by Ricky Lui): Lui Chung; 2nd Defendant: Yau Man Yick
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 8 May 2025
- Case Number
- HCA596/2021
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Partnership Dispute and Equitable Claims / Judgment at Trial (high Court, Court of First Instance)
- Outcome
- Judgment in favour of the Plaintiff in part: court found s44 conditions satisfied and misappropriation of some of the Deceased's entitlements; ordered taking of partnership account, inquiries and tracing; costs awarded to Plaintiff on a 70% basis.
- Legal Topics
- Dissolution of Partnership, Section 44 Partnership Ordinance, Taking of Partnership Account, Constructive Trust, Misappropriation of Partnership Assets, Tracing, Costs Apportionment
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lin Guifei
Plaintiff (administratrix of the Estate of Lee Kin Wah, Deceased)
Lui Chung
1st Defendant (deceased; Estate Represented by Ricky Lui)
Yau Man Yick
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Partnership Dispute and Equitable Claims / Judgment at Trial (high Court, Court of First Instance)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the business carried on after the deceased's death amounted to carry on the business of the firm for s44 purposes
- 2 Whether the Last Partnership was dissolved by the death of the deceased
- 3 Whether the Plaintiff is entitled to relief under s44 of the Partnership Ordinance
Ratio Decidendi
The court found the Last Partnership was dissolved on the Deceased's death; the Post-2017 Luen Fat carried on the business of the firm and at least some partnership assets (including unaccounted cash and unreconciled entitlements beyond the HK$312,696.20 cashier order) were utilised by the Defendants; the Defendants failed to discharge the burden of proving non-use of partnership assets; all statutory conditions in s44 were satisfied; therefore the Plaintiff is entitled to relief under s44 and the court ordered taking of partnership account, inquiries and tracing and found misappropriation of the Deceased's entitlements beyond the cashier order.
Court Disposition
Judgment in favour of the Plaintiff in part: court found s44 conditions satisfied and misappropriation of some of the Deceased's entitlements; ordered taking of partnership account, inquiries and tracing; costs awarded to Plaintiff on a 70% basis.
Orders
- There shall be taking of the partnership account of the Last Partnership as at 31 December 2016 including an account of all the Deceased's entitlements
- There shall be an account of and inquiries into what assets of the Last Partnership have been utilised by the 1st and 2nd Defendants in the Post-2017 Luen Fat and how they have been so utilised, including any profits generated
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment