TANG CHUN KIT AND ANOTHER v. TANG LO PING
The 1st Plaintiff, though illegitimate, is entitled to an equal share of distributions from Tang Nam Kai Tso; entitlement runs from 10 September 2004 (date of earlier judgment), no retrospective claims before that date are permitted, and the costs of these proceedings are to be paid from the Tso trust fund (with the Plaintiffs' own costs taxed under Legal Aid Regulations).
- Citation
- TANG CHUN KIT AND ANOTHER v. TANG LO PING
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: Tang Chun Kit (minor) by Tang Man Lok (father and next friend); 2nd Plaintiff: Tang Chung Ming (minor); Defendant (registered Manager): Tang Lo Ping (sued as registered manager for and on behalf of Tang Nam Kai (or Chai) Tso)
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 9 September 2005
- Case Number
- HCMP5529/2000
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Proceedings (hcmp) — Trust/tso Administration / Judgment on Declarations and Costs (court of First Instance)
- Outcome
- Declaration granted that the 1st Plaintiff is entitled to an equal share of distributions from Tang Nam Kai Tso as from 10 September 2004; no retrospective entitlement prior to that date; 2nd Plaintiff already receives full share from 10 September 2004; costs payable from the Tso fund; plaintiffs' own costs taxed...
- Legal Topics
- Distribution of Trust/tso Property, Status and Entitlement of Illegitimate Child, Administration Orders (order 85), Costs From Trust Fund, Declaration Remedy
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tang Chun Kit (minor) by Tang Man Lok (father and next friend)
1st Plaintiff
Tang Chung Ming (minor)
2nd Plaintiff
Tang Lo Ping (sued as registered manager for and on behalf of Tang Nam Kai (or Chai) Tso)
Defendant (registered Manager)
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Proceedings (hcmp) — Trust/tso Administration / Judgment on Declarations and Costs (court of First Instance)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an illegitimate child is entitled to an equal share of distributions from the Tso
- 2 From which date the 1st Plaintiff's entitlement to distribution should run
- 3 Whether retrospective claims prior to the judgment date are permissible
Ratio Decidendi
The 1st Plaintiff, though illegitimate, is entitled to an equal share of distributions from Tang Nam Kai Tso; entitlement runs from 10 September 2004 (date of earlier judgment), no retrospective claims before that date are permitted, and the costs of these proceedings are to be paid from the Tso trust fund (with the Plaintiffs' own costs taxed under Legal Aid Regulations).
Court Disposition
Declaration granted that the 1st Plaintiff is entitled to an equal share of distributions from Tang Nam Kai Tso as from 10 September 2004; no retrospective entitlement prior to that date; 2nd Plaintiff already receives full share from 10 September 2004; costs payable from the Tso fund; plaintiffs' own costs taxed...
Orders
- Declare that the 1st Plaintiff is entitled to be paid an equal share of distributions made to members of Tang Nam Kai Tso by the Tso as from 10 September 2004.
- No retrospective claims for distributions prior to 10 September 2004 (consistent with earlier judgment of 10 September 2004).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment