DREAM BIG DEVELOPMENTS LTD v. LIN MEI HUA
The Tribunal granted the compulsory sale because the applicant met the statutory ownership threshold (>90%), established redevelopment was justified by the age and poor state of repair of the buildings, proved it had taken reasonable steps to acquire remaining shares (including making a fair written offer and effecting substituted service on the missing owner), accepted the expert valuation evidence and set the merged-site RDV at HKD183,000,000 as the reserve price, approved sale by single public auction with trustees appointed and directed apportionment of proceeds and expenses by the ratio of the determined market values of properties.
- Citation
- [2024] HKLdT 75
- Parties
- Applicant: DREAM BIG DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED; 1st Respondent: LIN MEI HUA (林梅花); 2nd Respondent (discontinued): JOINT SUCCESS LIMITED (合順有限公司); 3rd Respondent (discontinued): CHEN PAOCHEN (陳寶珍); 4th Respondent (discontinued): YANG MAN (楊滿); 5th Respondent (discontinued): YANG HSIUYING (楊繡霙)
- Court
- Lands Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 4 September 2024
- Case Number
- LDCS21000/2022
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under Land (compulsory Sale for Redevelopment) Ordinance, Cap 545 / Judgment (trial Concluded)
- Outcome
- Order for sale granted
- Legal Topics
- Redevelopment Justification, Reasonable Steps to Acquire Shares, Valuation and Reserve Price, Apportionment of Proceeds, Trusteeship and Sale Procedures
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
DREAM BIG DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED
Applicant
LIN MEI HUA (林梅花)
1st Respondent
JOINT SUCCESS LIMITED (合順有限公司)
2nd Respondent (discontinued)
CHEN PAOCHEN (陳寶珍)
3rd Respondent (discontinued)
YANG MAN (楊滿)
4th Respondent (discontinued)
YANG HSIUYING (楊繡霙)
5th Respondent (discontinued)
Procedural Posture
Application Under Land (compulsory Sale for Redevelopment) Ordinance, Cap 545 / Judgment (trial Concluded)
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the market value of each property in the buildings as at 11 August 2022?
- 2 Is redevelopment justified due to age and/or state of repair under section 4(2)(a)?
- 3 Has the applicant taken reasonable steps to acquire all undivided shares under section 4(2)(b)?
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal granted the compulsory sale because the applicant met the statutory ownership threshold (>90%), established redevelopment was justified by the age and poor state of repair of the buildings, proved it had taken reasonable steps to acquire remaining shares (including making a fair written offer and effecting substituted service on the missing owner), accepted the expert valuation evidence and set the merged-site RDV at HKD183,000,000 as the reserve price, approved sale by single public auction with trustees appointed and directed apportionment of proceeds and expenses by the ratio of the determined market values of properties.
Court Disposition
Order for sale granted
Orders
- All undivided shares in the Lots to be sold by way of one public auction under one single reserve price for the purposes of redevelopment of the Lots
- Mr Ma Ho Fai and Ms Kung Ying Chang nominated by the applicant are appointed trustees to discharge duties imposed by the Ordinance in relation to the sale of the Lots and as directed by the Tribunal
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment