EAA SECURITIES LTD v. FATTYDAD ALICE PUI YAN, the Administratrix of the Estate of Fattydad Henry, Deceased
On the balance of probabilities the Court found most trading on Henry's account was unauthorized and concealed by Anita; Henry did not have requisite knowledge of the cheque deposits and intercepted statements so EAA could not rely on contractual deeming provisions or deemed receipt when its employee knew instructions were unauthorized; EAA had been negligent in supervision and cannot recover the claimed debit or the cheque proceeds from Anita or Henry; Henry's counterclaim for conversion/loss of portfolio succeeds and damages are assessed at $3,286,511 with pre-judgment interest awarded; third party indemnity and Anita's counterclaims are dismissed.
- Citation
- EAA SECURITIES LTD v. FATTYDAD ALICE PUI YAN, the Administratrix of the Estate of Fattydad Henry, Deceased
- Parties
- Plaintiff: EAA Securities Limited; Defendant Administratrix of the Estate of Fattydad Henry, Deceased (2nd Defendant): FATTYDAD ALICE PUI YAN; 1st Defendant: So Tai Fai
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 15 June 2017
- Case Number
- HCA2507/2003
- Procedural Posture
- Civil: Recovery of Margin Account Balance, Fiduciary/trust and Counterclaims in Securities Context / Trial Judgment (court of First Instance)
- Outcome
- EAA's primary and alternative claims dismissed; EAA's claims against Anita dismissed; Estate/Henry's counterclaim succeeded; Anita's counterclaims dismissed; EAA's third party claim for indemnity against Anita dismissed; costs orders made as below.
- Legal Topics
- Margin Account, Unauthorized Trading (churning), Knowing Receipt, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Conversion and Sale of Securities, Equitable Set Off, Indemnity Under Guarantee, Limitation Period, Damages Assessment, Discovery and Disclosure
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
EAA Securities Limited
Plaintiff
FATTYDAD ALICE PUI YAN
Defendant Administratrix of the Estate of Fattydad Henry, Deceased (2nd Defendant)
So Tai Fai
1st Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil: Recovery of Margin Account Balance, Fiduciary/trust and Counterclaims in Securities Context / Trial Judgment (court of First Instance)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the vast majority of transactions were authorized by the account holder (Henry) or unauthorized by Anita
- 2 Whether EAA can rely on account terms/deeming provisions when its employee knew transactions were unauthorized
- 3 Whether Henry (and/or the Estate) was a knowing recipient of cheque proceeds deposited to a joint account
Ratio Decidendi
On the balance of probabilities the Court found most trading on Henry's account was unauthorized and concealed by Anita; Henry did not have requisite knowledge of the cheque deposits and intercepted statements so EAA could not rely on contractual deeming provisions or deemed receipt when its employee knew instructions were unauthorized; EAA had been negligent in supervision and cannot recover the claimed debit or the cheque proceeds from Anita or Henry; Henry's counterclaim for conversion/loss of portfolio succeeds and damages are assessed at $3,286,511 with pre-judgment interest awarded; third party indemnity and Anita's counterclaims are dismissed.
Court Disposition
EAA's primary and alternative claims dismissed; EAA's claims against Anita dismissed; Estate/Henry's counterclaim succeeded; Anita's counterclaims dismissed; EAA's third party claim for indemnity against Anita dismissed; costs orders made as below.
Orders
- Judgment for the Estate (Henry) on the counterclaim in the sum of HKD 3,286,511 for loss of portfolio
- Pre-judgment interest awarded at simple interest 5% per annum from 11 October 2003 for six years in the sum of HKD 985,953
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment