EDISON NORGE AS v. BZZ LIMITED AND OTHERS
Default judgment entered against 1st, 2nd, 5th and 9th defendants because they were properly served and failed to defend; bank records and affidavits establish on balance of probabilities that the plaintiff owned the sums paid into those defendants' accounts so monetary judgments and limited declarations of proprietary interest are granted for identified sums; broader declarations (minimum balance constructive trusts and tracing into subsequent assets) are refused on default due to insufficient evidence to bind third parties or establish movements after identified dates; interest awarded at HSBC prime rate plus 1% until judgment then judgment rate; costs to plaintiff to be taxed if not...
- Citation
- [2021] HKCFI 135
- Parties
- Plaintiff: EDISON NORGE AS; 1st Defendant: BZZ LIMITED; 2nd Defendant: YANGWEN TRADE CO, LIMITED; 3rd Defendant: HONGKONG YI PING TRADE CO., LIMITED; Defendant: 5th Defendant; Defendant: 9th Defendant
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 10 December 2020
- Case Number
- HCA74/2020
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Action (fraud/proprietary Claims) / Chambers Hearing for Default Judgment and Declaratory Relief (decision)
- Outcome
- Default judgment entered against 1st, 2nd, 5th and 9th defendants; monetary judgments granted for sums identified against each defendant; limited declaratory relief granted that plaintiff is owner of the sums transferred into the defendants' accounts; broader declarations as to minimum balances and tracing into...
- Legal Topics
- Default Judgment, Constructive Trust, Tracing, Declaratory Relief, Monetary Judgment, Interest and Costs
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
EDISON NORGE AS
Plaintiff
BZZ LIMITED
1st Defendant
YANGWEN TRADE CO, LIMITED
2nd Defendant
HONGKONG YI PING TRADE CO., LIMITED
3rd Defendant
5th Defendant
Defendant
9th Defendant
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Action (fraud/proprietary Claims) / Chambers Hearing for Default Judgment and Declaratory Relief (decision)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether default judgment should be entered against defendants properly served
- 2 Whether plaintiff is entitled to monetary judgments for sums paid into defendants' accounts
- 3 Whether declaratory relief establishing constructive trusts and tracing should be granted on default
Ratio Decidendi
Default judgment entered against 1st, 2nd, 5th and 9th defendants because they were properly served and failed to defend; bank records and affidavits establish on balance of probabilities that the plaintiff owned the sums paid into those defendants' accounts so monetary judgments and limited declarations of proprietary interest are granted for identified sums; broader declarations (minimum balance constructive trusts and tracing into subsequent assets) are refused on default due to insufficient evidence to bind third parties or establish movements after identified dates; interest awarded at HSBC prime rate plus 1% until judgment then judgment rate; costs to plaintiff to be taxed if not...
Court Disposition
Default judgment entered against 1st, 2nd, 5th and 9th defendants; monetary judgments granted for sums identified against each defendant; limited declaratory relief granted that plaintiff is owner of the sums transferred into the defendants' accounts; broader declarations as to minimum balances and tracing into...
Orders
- Default judgment entered against 1st, 2nd, 5th and 9th defendants
- Monetary judgments for the sums identified in the plaintiff's draft order attached to his submissions (to be set out in final order)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment