ASG BROKERAGE LTD AND ANOTHER v. LAI CHEUK KWAN ARTHUR
Court found ASG Finance had no entitlement to recover under the guarantees; Bowen guarantee was in existence by June 2000 and was supported by consideration and enforceable against Mr Lai for HK$2,000,000; Chan guarantee signed about 22 November 2000 but no new or continued credit was granted thereafter so it lacked consideration and was unenforceable; Disengagement Agreement did not release ASG Brokerage and rectification/warranty claims failed; judgment entered for ASG Brokerage for HK$2,000,000 with contractual interest and costs ordered as specified.
- Citation
- ASG BROKERAGE LTD AND ANOTHER v. LAI CHEUK KWAN ARTHUR
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff (original Action); 1st Defendant by Counterclaim: ASG Brokerage Limited; 2nd Plaintiff (original Action); 2nd Defendant by Counterclaim: ASG Finance Limited; Defendant (original Action); Plaintiff by Counterclaim: Lai Cheuk Kwan Arthur; 3rd Defendant by Counterclaim: Asia Securities Global Limited; 4th Defendant by Counterclaim: ASG Futures Limited; 5th Defendant by Counterclaim: Arch Asset Management Limited
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 10 December 2004
- Case Number
- HCA3384/2001
- Procedural Posture
- Consolidated Civil Actions for Recovery Under Guarantees / Counterclaims for Rectification and Declarations / Judgment at First Instance (court of First Instance)
- Outcome
- Judgment for ASG Brokerage Limited on Bowen guarantee for HK$2,000,000; ASG Finance's claims dismissed; ASG Brokerage's claim on Chan guarantee dismissed; all counterclaims by Mr Lai dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Enforceability of Guarantees, Past Consideration, Date of Execution of Instrument, Rectification of Written Agreement, Release/waiver of Liabilities, Contractual Indemnity for Costs, Interest on Contractual Debt
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
ASG Brokerage Limited
1st Plaintiff (original Action); 1st Defendant by Counterclaim
ASG Finance Limited
2nd Plaintiff (original Action); 2nd Defendant by Counterclaim
Lai Cheuk Kwan Arthur
Defendant (original Action); Plaintiff by Counterclaim
Asia Securities Global Limited
3rd Defendant by Counterclaim
ASG Futures Limited
4th Defendant by Counterclaim
Arch Asset Management Limited
5th Defendant by Counterclaim
Procedural Posture
Consolidated Civil Actions for Recovery Under Guarantees / Counterclaims for Rectification and Declarations / Judgment at First Instance (court of First Instance)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Bowen and Chan guarantees were supported by consideration
- 2 When the Bowen guarantee was signed
- 3 Whether ASG Finance had standing to recover under the guarantees
Ratio Decidendi
Court found ASG Finance had no entitlement to recover under the guarantees; Bowen guarantee was in existence by June 2000 and was supported by consideration and enforceable against Mr Lai for HK$2,000,000; Chan guarantee signed about 22 November 2000 but no new or continued credit was granted thereafter so it lacked consideration and was unenforceable; Disengagement Agreement did not release ASG Brokerage and rectification/warranty claims failed; judgment entered for ASG Brokerage for HK$2,000,000 with contractual interest and costs ordered as specified.
Court Disposition
Judgment for ASG Brokerage Limited on Bowen guarantee for HK$2,000,000; ASG Finance's claims dismissed; ASG Brokerage's claim on Chan guarantee dismissed; all counterclaims by Mr Lai dismissed.
Orders
- Judgment for ASG Brokerage Limited in HCA 3384/2001 for HK$2,000,000 (principal)
- Interest on HK$2,000,000 at 3% above HSBC prime from 30 May 2001 until judgment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment