JOHN ROBERT LEES and TSUI CHI CHIU, the Joint and Several Liquidators of GMF FINANCE LTD (in Creditors’ Voluntary Liquidation) v. CLOUTIER GUY EVON HUANG JIALIN
The court exercised its discretion under s18(3) MLO to uphold and enforce the loan agreement and registered second charge because the defendants received and used the actual loan amount, suffered no prejudice from the statutory and procedural inaccuracies, the plaintiffs remedied and conceded certain charges and reduced the effective interest to 18.1% p.a., and the defects were severable and insignificant; accordingly the master's order for repayment and possession was upheld and the appeal dismissed.
- Citation
- [2018] HKCFI 366
- Parties
- Plaintiff (joint and Several Liquidator of GMF Finance Limited): John Robert Lees; Plaintiff (joint and Several Liquidator of GMF Finance Limited): Tsui Chi Chiu; Defendant (registered Owner of the Property): 1st Defendant; Defendant (registered Owner of the Property): 2nd Defendant
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 28 February 2018
- Case Number
- HCMP3079/2016
- Procedural Posture
- Mortgagee Action / Originating Summons Under Money Lenders Ordinance / Appeal From Master's Order — Rehearing on Summons (hcmp 3079/2016)
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; master's order upheld in all material respects
- Legal Topics
- Enforceability of Loan Agreements, Statutory Compliance With Money Lenders Ordinance, Section 18(3) Discretionary Relief, Default Interest and Penalties, Severance Clause, Order 88 Rules of the High Court Non Compliance, Costs (indemnity Basis)
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Robert Lees
Plaintiff (joint and Several Liquidator of GMF Finance Limited)
Tsui Chi Chiu
Plaintiff (joint and Several Liquidator of GMF Finance Limited)
1st Defendant
Defendant (registered Owner of the Property)
2nd Defendant
Defendant (registered Owner of the Property)
Procedural Posture
Mortgagee Action / Originating Summons Under Money Lenders Ordinance / Appeal From Master's Order — Rehearing on Summons (hcmp 3079/2016)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether breaches of the Money Lenders Ordinance (incorrect principal and interest disclosures, upfront charges, penalty/early repayment restriction) render the loan agreement and security unenforceable
- 2 Whether the court should exercise discretion under s18(3) MLO to uphold an otherwise non-compliant agreement
- 3 Whether the default/enhanced interest rate and upfront charges are unlawful and/or render the agreement unenforceable
Ratio Decidendi
The court exercised its discretion under s18(3) MLO to uphold and enforce the loan agreement and registered second charge because the defendants received and used the actual loan amount, suffered no prejudice from the statutory and procedural inaccuracies, the plaintiffs remedied and conceded certain charges and reduced the effective interest to 18.1% p.a., and the defects were severable and insignificant; accordingly the master's order for repayment and possession was upheld and the appeal dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; master's order upheld in all material respects
Orders
- The sum of HK$6,377,248.79 to be paid by the defendants to the plaintiffs with interest from date of decision at 18.1% per annum
- Vacant possession of the Property (2nd Floor, Tower 5 Avignon and car parking space P220) to be delivered by the defendants to the plaintiffs within 21 days of the order
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment