SEAN ERIC MCLEAN HOTUNG v. HILLHEAD LTD
The pleaded condition that trustees were "not to be concerned with" management was not established as a binding trust condition; the plaintiff's substantive claims were dismissed except for a declaration that one share in Hotung Enterprises Limited held by the 1st defendant is held on trust for the plaintiff absolutely; rectification and injunctions sought were refused; costs were awarded against the plaintiff to the defendants generally, with the 4th defendant's costs to be borne by the plaintiff (taxed party and party and payable out of trust assets subject to taxation on trustee basis) and no indemnity costs awarded; applications relating to HCMP 2820/2002 and HCMP 4511/2002 were...
- Citation
- SEAN ERIC MCLEAN HOTUNG v. HILLHEAD LTD
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Eric Edward Hotung; 1st Defendant: Ho Yuen Ki; 2nd Defendant: Anthony Eric Ryan Hotung; 3rd Defendant: Sean Eric McLean Hotung; 4th Defendant: Hillhead Limited; 5th Defendant: Sheridan Patricia Hotung Shea; 6th Defendant: Gabrielle Marie Hotung
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 17 June 2005
- Case Number
- HCMP2820/2002
- Procedural Posture
- Trusts and Company Litigation (consolidated Actions) / Post Trial Ruling on Order and Costs
- Outcome
- Plaintiff's claims dismissed save for a declaration that one share in Hotung Enterprises Limited held by the 1st defendant is held on trust for the plaintiff absolutely; costs orders as specified.
- Legal Topics
- Rectification of Trust Deed, Trustee Duties and Obligations, Fiduciary Duties of Managing Shareholder, Beddoe Applications, Costs Orders and Taxation
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Eric Edward Hotung
Plaintiff
Ho Yuen Ki
1st Defendant
Anthony Eric Ryan Hotung
2nd Defendant
Sean Eric McLean Hotung
3rd Defendant
Hillhead Limited
4th Defendant
Sheridan Patricia Hotung Shea
5th Defendant
Gabrielle Marie Hotung
6th Defendant
Procedural Posture
Trusts and Company Litigation (consolidated Actions) / Post Trial Ruling on Order and Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the pleaded condition that trustees were not to be concerned with management constituted a binding trust condition
- 2 Whether trust deeds should be rectified to impose restrictions on trustees' voting/management powers
- 3 Whether the plaintiff retained the right to manage companies free of interference by trustees
Ratio Decidendi
The pleaded condition that trustees were "not to be concerned with" management was not established as a binding trust condition; the plaintiff's substantive claims were dismissed except for a declaration that one share in Hotung Enterprises Limited held by the 1st defendant is held on trust for the plaintiff absolutely; rectification and injunctions sought were refused; costs were awarded against the plaintiff to the defendants generally, with the 4th defendant's costs to be borne by the plaintiff (taxed party and party and payable out of trust assets subject to taxation on trustee basis) and no indemnity costs awarded; applications relating to HCMP 2820/2002 and HCMP 4511/2002 were...
Court Disposition
Plaintiff's claims dismissed save for a declaration that one share in Hotung Enterprises Limited held by the 1st defendant is held on trust for the plaintiff absolutely; costs orders as specified.
Orders
- Plaintiff\'s claim dismissed except that one share in Hotung Enterprises Limited held by the 1st Defendant is held by her on trust for the plaintiff absolutely.
- Plaintiff to pay the costs of the 2nd, 3rd and 5th defendants in the consolidated action (party and party), taxed if not agreed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment