E-TRADE SECURITIES LLC v. CEDALIAN CARE SERVICES CONSULTANTS LTD AND OTHERS
Default judgment was set aside because the 4th defendant provided affidavit evidence showing an arguable defence with a real prospect of success and an explanation for delay which, when weighed against the ability to compensate prejudice by payment into court and costs, justified setting aside; relief was conditional on payment into court of HK$466,500 plus HK$10,000 interest, discharge of the Mareva injunction, and directions to file a defence within 14 days.
- Citation
- E-TRADE SECURITIES LLC v. CEDALIAN CARE SERVICES CONSULTANTS LTD AND OTHERS
- Parties
- Plaintiff: E*TRADE SECURITIES LLC; 1st Defendant: CEDALIAN CARE SERVICES CONSULTANTS LIMITED; 2nd Defendant: HAVI INDUSTRIAL (H.K.) CO., LIMITED; 3rd Defendant: HONG KONG XIE YING TRADING CO., LIMITED; 4th Defendant: KWOK WAI ELECTRONIC LIMITED
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 9 March 2017
- Case Number
- HCA2312/2016
- Procedural Posture
- Fraud / Recovery of Funds / Application to Set Aside Default Judgment Following Mareva Injunction; Interlocutory Directions for Defence
- Outcome
- Application to set aside default judgment allowed on conditions
- Legal Topics
- Default Judgment, Setting Aside, Mareva Injunction, Ministerial Receipt, Bona Fide Purchaser for Value, Service and Delay, Costs
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
E*TRADE SECURITIES LLC
Plaintiff
CEDALIAN CARE SERVICES CONSULTANTS LIMITED
1st Defendant
HAVI INDUSTRIAL (H.K.) CO., LIMITED
2nd Defendant
HONG KONG XIE YING TRADING CO., LIMITED
3rd Defendant
KWOK WAI ELECTRONIC LIMITED
4th Defendant
Procedural Posture
Fraud / Recovery of Funds / Application to Set Aside Default Judgment Following Mareva Injunction; Interlocutory Directions for Defence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the 4th defendant demonstrated a defence with a real prospect of success sufficient to set aside default judgment
- 2 Whether the explanation for delay in defending was acceptable to extend time to file a defence
- 3 Whether payment into court would ameliorate prejudice and justify setting aside judgment and discharging the Mareva injunction
Ratio Decidendi
Default judgment was set aside because the 4th defendant provided affidavit evidence showing an arguable defence with a real prospect of success and an explanation for delay which, when weighed against the ability to compensate prejudice by payment into court and costs, justified setting aside; relief was conditional on payment into court of HK$466,500 plus HK$10,000 interest, discharge of the Mareva injunction, and directions to file a defence within 14 days.
Court Disposition
Application to set aside default judgment allowed on conditions
Orders
- Default judgment against the 4th defendant set aside conditional on payment into court of HK$466,500 plus interest of HK$10,000
- Payment of HK$466,500 and HK$10,000 interest to be brought into court by the 4th defendant
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment