TIONG KING SING v. SAM BOON PENG YEE AND ANOTHER
At the ex parte leave stage under Order 52 rule 2 the court performs a prima facie filtering exercise and is not to decide admissibility or resolve credibility; Cheng\'s solicitor\'s affirmation was justified given the 1st Defendant\'s incapacity to attend and the solicitor\'s interviews; the Statement disclosed a reasonable cause of action on the pleaded facts; the two letters did not amount to material non-disclosure that would have prevented the court granting ex parte leave, so the ex parte leave was correctly granted and should not be set aside.
- Citation
- TIONG KING SING v. SAM BOON PENG YEE AND ANOTHER
- Parties
- Plaintiff (hca 1517/2011) / Defendant (hcmp 1404/2014): Tiong King Sing; 1st Defendant (hca 1517/2011) / 1st Plaintiff (hcmp 1404/2014): Sam Boon Peng Yee; 2nd Defendant (hca 1517/2011) / 2nd Plaintiff (hcmp 1404/2014): New Sunshine Investments Limited
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 21 January 2015
- Case Number
- HCA1517/2011
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Committal (contempt) Application Arising From Breach of Undertaking; Interlocutory Applications in Related HCA and HCMP Proceedings / Interlocutory: Application to Strike/exclude Affidavit and to Set Aside Ex Parte Leave (ex Parte Leave Granted; Substantive Committal Hearing Adjourned)
- Outcome
- HCA Summons dismissed; ex parte leave to issue committal proceedings upheld; HCMP Summons adjourned sine die with liberty to restore
- Legal Topics
- Ex Parte Leave for Committal, Duty of Full and Frank Disclosure, Admissibility of Hearsay and Solicitor Affirmations, Striking Out Affidavits, Pleading Reasonable Cause of Action
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tiong King Sing
Plaintiff (hca 1517/2011) / Defendant (hcmp 1404/2014)
Sam Boon Peng Yee
1st Defendant (hca 1517/2011) / 1st Plaintiff (hcmp 1404/2014)
New Sunshine Investments Limited
2nd Defendant (hca 1517/2011) / 2nd Plaintiff (hcmp 1404/2014)
Procedural Posture
Civil Committal (contempt) Application Arising From Breach of Undertaking; Interlocutory Applications in Related HCA and HCMP Proceedings / Interlocutory: Application to Strike/exclude Affidavit and to Set Aside Ex Parte Leave (ex Parte Leave Granted; Substantive Committal Hearing Adjourned)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a solicitor\'s affirmation (Cheng\'s 12th Affirmation) was defective or should be expunged
- 2 Whether the Statement disclosed a reasonable cause of action for committal
- 3 Whether defendants breached the duty of full and frank disclosure when obtaining ex parte leave by failing to disclose two letters from plaintiff\'s solicitors
Ratio Decidendi
At the ex parte leave stage under Order 52 rule 2 the court performs a prima facie filtering exercise and is not to decide admissibility or resolve credibility; Cheng\'s solicitor\'s affirmation was justified given the 1st Defendant\'s incapacity to attend and the solicitor\'s interviews; the Statement disclosed a reasonable cause of action on the pleaded facts; the two letters did not amount to material non-disclosure that would have prevented the court granting ex parte leave, so the ex parte leave was correctly granted and should not be set aside.
Court Disposition
HCA Summons dismissed; ex parte leave to issue committal proceedings upheld; HCMP Summons adjourned sine die with liberty to restore
Orders
- HCA Summons dated 30 July 2014 dismissed with costs; certificate for two counsel granted
- HCMP Summons dated 30 July 2014 adjourned sine die with liberty to restore
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment