TO PUI KUI AND OTHERS v. HULTUCKTONG COMMERCIAL & INDUSTRIAL CO LTD AND OTHERS
Application to vary prior orders and to adduce new handwriting expert evidence was refused because no sufficient cause was shown, the consolidated actions had been prepared and tried on the basis of the existing orders, cross-examination was adequate for live witnesses, reopening evidence would be unfair and contrary to the objectives of procedural economy and consolidation, and would defeat prior case management directions.
- Citation
- TO PUI KUI AND OTHERS v. HULTUCKTONG COMMERCIAL & INDUSTRIAL CO LTD AND OTHERS
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff HCA 51/2007; 4th Defendant HCA 1040/2009; 4th Defendant HCA 1041/2009: Ng Kwok Piu Philip; 2nd Plaintiff HCA 51/2007; 2nd Defendant HCA 1040/2009; 2nd Defendant HCA 1041/2009; 1st Plaintiff HCA 188/2010: Confederated Assets Group Limited; 3rd Plaintiff HCA 51/2007; 3rd Defendant HCA 1040/2009; 3rd Defendant HCA 1041/2009; 2nd Plaintiff HCA 188/2010: Well Arts Enterprises Limited; 1st Defendant HCA 51/2007; 1st Plaintiff HCA 1040/2009; 1st Plaintiff HCA 1041/2009; 2nd Defendant HCA 188/2010: To Pui Kui; 2nd Defendant HCA 51/2007; 3rd Plaintiff HCA 1040/2009; 4th Plaintiff HCA 1041/2009: Ng Kwok Tai Andrew; 3rd Defendant HCA 51/2007; 2nd Plaintiff HCA 1040/2009; 2nd Plaintiff HCA 1041/2009: Ng Yiu Chi Eleanor; 4th Defendant HCA 51/2007: Ng Sheung Ming Association Limited; 5th Defendant HCA 1040/2009; 5th Defendant HCA 1041/2009: Ng Oi Che Stephanie; 3rd Plaintiff HCA 1041/2009: Ng Kay Chee Angela; 1st Defendant HCA 1040/2009: Hultucktong Commercial & Industrial Company Limited; 1st Defendant HCA 1041/2009: Hultucktong Company Limited; 3rd Plaintiff HCA 188/2010: Auto-Express Services Limited; 1st Defendant HCA 188/2010: Ng Kwok Ching; 3rd Defendant HCA 188/2010: Ng Wing Kai Victor; 4th Defendant HCA 188/2010: Wington Development Limited; 5th Defendant HCA 188/2010: La Casa Tabaquera Limited; 6th Defendant HCA 188/2010: Excellent Best Development Limited
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 6 March 2014
- Case Number
- HCA1040/2009
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Consolidated Actions (family/company Dispute Involving Alleged 1997 Restructuring) / Interlocutory Application and Directions Hearing (application for Leave to Adduce Expert Handwriting Evidence Dismissed)
- Outcome
- Summons dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Expert Evidence, Handwriting Authentication, Consolidation, Issue Estoppel, Trial Management, Civil Justice Reform Principles
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ng Kwok Piu Philip
1st Plaintiff HCA 51/2007; 4th Defendant HCA 1040/2009; 4th Defendant HCA 1041/2009
Confederated Assets Group Limited
2nd Plaintiff HCA 51/2007; 2nd Defendant HCA 1040/2009; 2nd Defendant HCA 1041/2009; 1st Plaintiff HCA 188/2010
Well Arts Enterprises Limited
3rd Plaintiff HCA 51/2007; 3rd Defendant HCA 1040/2009; 3rd Defendant HCA 1041/2009; 2nd Plaintiff HCA 188/2010
To Pui Kui
1st Defendant HCA 51/2007; 1st Plaintiff HCA 1040/2009; 1st Plaintiff HCA 1041/2009; 2nd Defendant HCA 188/2010
Ng Kwok Tai Andrew
2nd Defendant HCA 51/2007; 3rd Plaintiff HCA 1040/2009; 4th Plaintiff HCA 1041/2009
Ng Yiu Chi Eleanor
3rd Defendant HCA 51/2007; 2nd Plaintiff HCA 1040/2009; 2nd Plaintiff HCA 1041/2009
Ng Sheung Ming Association Limited
4th Defendant HCA 51/2007
Ng Oi Che Stephanie
5th Defendant HCA 1040/2009; 5th Defendant HCA 1041/2009
Ng Kay Chee Angela
3rd Plaintiff HCA 1041/2009
Hultucktong Commercial & Industrial Company Limited
1st Defendant HCA 1040/2009
Hultucktong Company Limited
1st Defendant HCA 1041/2009
Auto-Express Services Limited
3rd Plaintiff HCA 188/2010
Ng Kwok Ching
1st Defendant HCA 188/2010
Ng Wing Kai Victor
3rd Defendant HCA 188/2010
Wington Development Limited
4th Defendant HCA 188/2010
La Casa Tabaquera Limited
5th Defendant HCA 188/2010
Excellent Best Development Limited
6th Defendant HCA 188/2010
Procedural Posture
Civil Consolidated Actions (family/company Dispute Involving Alleged 1997 Restructuring) / Interlocutory Application and Directions Hearing (application for Leave to Adduce Expert Handwriting Evidence Dismissed)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether sufficient cause existed to vary prior court orders limiting expert handwriting evidence to the deceased father's signatures
- 2 Whether expert handwriting evidence on signatures of living witnesses is necessary given prior orders and available cross-examination
- 3 Whether permitting fresh expert evidence would be fair and proportionate and consistent with objectives of consolidation and Civil Justice Reform
Ratio Decidendi
Application to vary prior orders and to adduce new handwriting expert evidence was refused because no sufficient cause was shown, the consolidated actions had been prepared and tried on the basis of the existing orders, cross-examination was adequate for live witnesses, reopening evidence would be unfair and contrary to the objectives of procedural economy and consolidation, and would defeat prior case management directions.
Court Disposition
Summons dismissed
Orders
- Summons by Philip's camp for leave to adduce expert handwriting evidence dismissed
- Costs awarded against Philip's camp, with certificate for two Counsel
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment