FAISAL OMAR v. TORTURE CLAIMS APPEAL BOARD / NON-REFOULEMENT CLAIMS PETITION OFFICE [Decision on Leave Application]

FAISAL OMAR v. TORTURE CLAIMS APPEAL BOARD / NON-REFOULEMENT CLAIMS PETITION OFFICE [Decision on Leave Application]

Leave dismissed because the applicant failed to identify any reasonably arguable ground with a realistic prospect of success; careful scrutiny of the TCAB/NRCPO decision revealed no procedural unfairness, error of law or irrationality; the Board's factual findings on risk, state protection and credibility were within its province and supported by the evidence, so judicial review was not warranted.

Citation
[2025] HKCFI 3984
Parties
Applicant: Faisal Omar; Putative Respondent: Torture Claims Appeal Board/Non-Refoulement Claims Petition Office; Putative Interested Party: Director of Immigration
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
8 September 2025
Case Number
HCAL698/2020
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Apply for Judicial Review (non Refoulement/torture Claim) / Leave Application (dismissed)
Outcome
Application for leave to apply for Judicial Review dismissed.
Legal Topics
Non Refoulement, Torture Risk, Persecution, Hong Kong Bill of Rights (articles 2 and 3), Leave to Apply for Judicial Review, Procedural Fairness, Wednesbury/irrationality Standard, State Protection, Internal Relocation, Admissibility of Fresh Evidence (ladd V Marshall)
Source Language
EN
Administrative Law Constitutional Law Immigration Law Human Rights Law Asylum and Non Refoulement Law Non Refoulement Torture Risk Persecution +7 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 6 Authorities cited 20 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Faisal Omar

Applicant

Torture Claims Appeal Board/Non-Refoulement Claims Petition Office

Putative Respondent

Director of Immigration

Putative Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Application for Leave to Apply for Judicial Review (non Refoulement/torture Claim) / Leave Application (dismissed)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant established any reasonably arguable ground of judicial review with a realistic prospect of success
  2. 2 Whether the TCAB/NRCPO decision was affected by procedural unfairness
  3. 3 Whether there was error of law or Wednesbury irrationality in the TCAB/NRCPO decision

Ratio Decidendi

Leave dismissed because the applicant failed to identify any reasonably arguable ground with a realistic prospect of success; careful scrutiny of the TCAB/NRCPO decision revealed no procedural unfairness, error of law or irrationality; the Board's factual findings on risk, state protection and credibility were within its province and supported by the evidence, so judicial review was not warranted.

Court Disposition

Application for leave to apply for Judicial Review dismissed.

Orders

  • Form 86 amended on the Court's own motion to name only the Torture Claims Appeal Board/Non-Refoulement Claims Petition Office as Putative Respondent and only the Director of Immigration as Putative Interested Party
  • Application for leave to apply for Judicial Review dismissed